opengaming/osgameclones

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

Scan timing: clone 1.42s · analysis 0.53s · 2.4 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

https://github.com/opengaming/osgameclones · scanned 2026-05-31 01:24 UTC (5 days, 8 hours ago) · 10 languages

99 findings (39 legacy + 60 scanner) 32nd percentile · Python · small (2-20K LoC) Scanner says 81 (lower by 20)

File as issue Image v2 schema

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days, 8 hours ago · v2 · 69 findings from 2 sources. Findings combine the legacy security pipeline AND the multi-layer engine (atlas, wiring, flows, ranked) AND verified AI agent contributions.

JSON

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	75.0	0.15	11.25
`security_score`	83.5	0.25	20.88
`testing_score`	0.0	0.20	0.00
`documentation_score`	71.1	0.15	10.66
`practices_score`	77.0	0.15	11.55
`code_quality`	66.0	0.10	6.60
Overall		1.00	60.9

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 24 Medium 15 Low 17 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Legacy 39 9-layer 30 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 21 Cicd 18 Security 2 Software 19 Api 1 Frontend 4 Hardware 4

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Fragile runtime 15 findings

What it is: Code that runs but breaks under predictable input — division by zero, missing keys, unbounded loops, off-by-one slicing.

Why it matters: Reaches production undetected because happy-path tests pass. First user with a weird input crashes the request.

How AI causes it: AI loves writing the happy path; doesn't probe edge cases unless explicitly asked.

Fix approach: Add property-based tests. Wrap external inputs with explicit validators. Use the framework's typed deserializer (Pydantic, attrs).

12 matching findings on this repo

medium Bare except continues silently _ext.py:262
medium Mutable default argument in `parse_item` (dict) _ext.py:126
medium Mutable default argument in `parse_item` (list) _ext.py:126
medium Public web service has no security.txt .well-known/security.txt
medium Public web app has no Content Security Policy index.html
low [COMP001] High cognitive complexity: Function `main` has cognitive complexity 9… scripts/check_links.py:19
low [COMP001] High cognitive complexity: Function `main` has cognitive complexity 1… scripts/awesome_game_remakes.py:26
low Public web app has no humans.txt humans.txt
low Public docs site has no llms.txt llms.txt
low Public web app has no sitemap sitemap.xml
info [MINED044] Js Console Log Prod: console.log left in code. Should be replaced wi… templates/forms/static/main.js:20
info [MINED072] Python Pass Only Class: class Foo: pass — stub waiting to be filled … render.py:32

View all fragile runtime findings →

Commented-out code 1 finding

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

1 matching finding on this repo

info Commented-code block (5 lines) in _ext.py:361

View all commented-out code findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/72d19b5e-7f9c-4656-9ae4-1db71aafbad8/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/72d19b5e-7f9c-4656-9ae4-1db71aafbad8/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.