Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

l1ghtny/amo_fix_fields

https://github.com/l1ghtny/amo_fix_fields · scanned 2026-06-16 04:31 UTC (2 months ago)

24 raw signals (0 security + 24 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months ago · v1 · 12 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 12 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
71.2
/100
Security checks
71
0 findings
System graph
71
66.7% cov · 12 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 2 Medium 3 Low 7 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 12 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 4 Hardware 1 Quality 5 Security 2
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 71.2/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 172 nodes across 4 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 24 findings — concentrated in quality (17), software (4), security (2). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 2 high, 3 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 12 of 12 actionable findings. 24 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high System graph security auth conf 1.00 FastAPI POST `cdek_status` without auth dependency — webhooks.py:105
`@router.post` decorator with no `Depends(get_current_user)` or auth-shaped dependency in its signature. Mutating endpoints should require authentication unless explicitly public.
webhooks.py:105 securityAuth fastapi unauth mutation
high System graph security auth conf 1.00 FastAPI POST `lead_change` without auth dependency — webhooks.py:121
`@router.post` decorator with no `Depends(get_current_user)` or auth-shaped dependency in its signature. Mutating endpoints should require authentication unless explicitly public.
webhooks.py:121 securityAuth fastapi unauth mutation
medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests, operator-readme. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph hardware Security conf 1.00 Dockerfile runs as root: Dockerfile
No non-root USER set. Containers running as root expand the blast radius of any vulnerability inside the image.
Container
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 15 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 13 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: metrika_client.py:init, metrika_client.py:init This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
13 occurrences
repo-level (13 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Docs conf 1.00 No README detected
No README file was found. Generated repos without README context are hard to operate, validate, or safely hand off.
ReadmeRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: auth
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
api.py:200
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: build_pdf_bytes
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
picking_pdf.py:78
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: formatTime
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
webhooks.py:36
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: remove_tag
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
amo_service.py:399
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/73bb2e76-6941-492d-a0bf-4725d7c342cd/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/73bb2e76-6941-492d-a0bf-4725d7c342cd/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.