Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

bloknayrb/tandem

https://github.com/bloknayrb/tandem · scanned 2026-06-17 01:42 UTC (1 month, 1 week ago)

293 raw signals (0 security + 293 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 1 week ago · v2 · last Δ -29.2 (diff) · 289 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 4 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

100.0% cov · 289 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 25 Medium 42 Low 39 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 289 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 14 Security 23 Cicd 4 Quality 219 Api 29

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Legacy markers 1 finding

What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.

Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.

How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.

Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.

1 matching finding on this repo

low Old/deprecated-named symbol `ann_legacy` in tests/server/annotations/sync.test.…

View all legacy markers findings →

Commented-out code 178 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

12 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (5 lines) in vitest.config.ts:46
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in playwright.config.ts:4
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in tests/scripts/build-reaper.test.ts:6
info Commented-code block (9 lines) in tests/tauri-driver/wdio.conf.ts:3
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/tauri-driver/specs/prevent-default.e2e.…
info Commented-code block (11 lines) in tests/channel/event-bridge.test.ts:486
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/server/event-queue-observer-split.test.…
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in tests/server/provider.test.ts:88
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in tests/server/typing-presence.test.ts:144
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/server/mdast-ydoc.test.ts:751
info Commented-code block (8 lines) in tests/server/rename-route.test.ts:98
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/server/annotations.test.ts:312

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 7 findings

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

7 matching findings on this repo

high Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: .claude/reviews/pr-578.codex.md .claude/reviews/pr-578.codex.md:374
high Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: .claude/reviews/pr-579.codex.md .claude/reviews/pr-579.codex.md:1079
high Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: .claude/reviews/pr-580.codex.md .claude/reviews/pr-580.codex.md:1273
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in vitest.config.ts:46
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in playwright.config.ts:4
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in tests/server/integrations/existing-config.tes…
info Commented-code block (8 lines) in src/server/integrations/existing-config.ts:219

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/7639b1c3-eb2e-43bd-9638-33158cbb7b68/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/7639b1c3-eb2e-43bd-9638-33158cbb7b68/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.