Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

Scan timing: clone 2.32s · analysis 5.05s · 2.6 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

0xisraekl/Griep-Mendes-Investments

https://github.com/0xisraekl/Griep-Mendes-Investments · scanned 2026-06-16 03:55 UTC (2 months ago) · 10 languages

22 raw signals (17 security + 5 graph) 0th percentile · Typescript · tiny (<2K LoC) System graph score 63 (lower by 14)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months ago · v1 · 22 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 100.0 0.15 15.00
security_score 82.9 0.25 20.73
testing_score 0.0 0.20 0.00
documentation_score 0.0 0.15 0.00
practices_score 42.0 0.15 6.30
code_quality 70.0 0.10 7.00
Overall 1.00 49.0
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 63.0/100 with 33.3% coverage. It contains 10 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 5 findings — concentrated in quality (4), frontend (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 2 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 18 of 22 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high Security checks security auth conf 0.78 Consent is collected in UI without visible backend audit persistence
A frontend journey appears to ask for consent to share identity/KYC/biometric data, but backend code does not show a consent audit model with scope, purpose, legal text version, timestamp, IP, or user-agent evidence.
src/App.tsx:1290
high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.88 esbuild: GHSA-gv7w-rqvm-qjhr
esbuild: Missing binary integrity verification in Deno module enables remote code execution via NPM_CONFIG_REGISTRY
package-lock.json
high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.88 vite: GHSA-fx2h-pf6j-xcff
vite: `server.fs.deny` bypass on Windows alternate paths
package-lock.json
medium Security checks software dependencies conf 0.88 esbuild: GHSA-67mh-4wv8-2f99
esbuild enables any website to send any requests to the development server and read the response
package-lock.json
high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 npm package `@types/react-dom` is 1 major version(s) behind (18.3.7 -> 19.2.3)
`@types/react-dom` is pinned/resolved at 18.3.7 but the latest stable release on the npm registry is 19.2.3 (1 major version(s) behind). Outdated dependencies accumulate unpatched bugs and make future security upgrades harder. This is the version-currency signal Dependabot version-update PRs raise.
package.json
high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 npm package `@vitejs/plugin-react` is 2 major version(s) behind (4.7.0 -> 6.0.2)
`@vitejs/plugin-react` is pinned/resolved at 4.7.0 but the latest stable release on the npm registry is 6.0.2 (2 major version(s) behind). Outdated dependencies accumulate unpatched bugs and make future security upgrades harder. This is the version-currency signal Dependabot version-update PRs rais…
package.json
medium Security checks quality Quality conf 0.70 Public web app has no Content Security Policy
A Content Security Policy reduces the blast radius of injected scripts if the app is ever served through preview, static hosting, or a web container outside its normal sandbox.
index.html
medium Security checks quality Quality conf 0.78 Public web service has no security.txt
security.txt gives researchers and customers a safe disclosure channel. Public web apps and APIs should publish it under /.well-known/security.txt.
.well-known/security.txt
medium Security checks software dependencies conf 0.88 vite: GHSA-4w7w-66w2-5vf9
Vite Vulnerable to Path Traversal in Optimized Deps `.map` Handling
package-lock.json
medium Security checks software dependencies conf 0.88 vite: GHSA-v6wh-96g9-6wx3
launch-editor: NTLMv2 hash disclosure via UNC path handling on Windows
package-lock.json
medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests, operator-readme. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 3 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low Security checks quality Documentation No LICENSE file
Add a LICENSE file to your repository. Use choosealicense.com to pick the right license (MIT for permissive, Apache 2.0 for patent protection, GPL for copyleft).
low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.50 Public web app has no humans.txt
humans.txt is optional, but it gives operators and reviewers a simple place to find ownership, contact, and important public documentation links.
humans.txt
low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.74 Public web app has no robots.txt
Public websites should publish a robots.txt file so crawlers and AI agents can discover crawl rules and sitemap locations without guessing.
robots.txt
low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.72 Public web app has no sitemap
A sitemap gives search engines, docs crawlers, and AI agents a structured list of public pages. Without one, important docs and product pages are easy to miss.
sitemap.xml
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Docs conf 1.00 No README detected
No README file was found. Generated repos without README context are hard to operate, validate, or safely hand off.
ReadmeRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/7adc0ce6-2119-4acb-b57d-3f1b1ac4382f/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/7adc0ce6-2119-4acb-b57d-3f1b1ac4382f/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.