microsoft/Agents-for-python

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

158 of your 252 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 1.67s · analysis 22.14s · 3.8 MB · GitHub preflight 423ms

https://github.com/microsoft/Agents-for-python · scanned 2026-06-05 21:23 UTC (4 days, 12 hours ago) · 10 languages

509 raw signals (237 security + 272 graph) 51st percentile · Python · medium (20-100K LoC) System graph score 70 (lower by 6)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 12 hours ago · v2 · 223 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 124 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

88.9% cov · 115 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	40.0	0.15	6.00
`security_score`	17.4	0.25	4.35
`testing_score`	100.0	0.20	20.00
`documentation_score`	88.0	0.15	13.20
`practices_score`	94.0	0.15	14.10
`code_quality`	63.8	0.10	6.38
Overall		1.00	64.0

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 2 High 32 Medium 20 Low 112 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 108 System graph 115 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 108 Software 96 Security 14 Cicd 2 Frontend 1 Api 2

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 3 findings

What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.

Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.

How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.

Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.

3 matching findings on this repo

low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 4 places repo-level

View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →

Commented-out code 8 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

8 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (8 lines) in tests/authentication_msal/test_msal_auth.py:2…
info Commented-code block (8 lines) in tests/_common/testing_objects/mocks/mock_oaut…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/_integration/test_quickstart.py:27
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in tests/_integration/common/testing_environment…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in dev/testing/microsoft-agents-testing/tests/cl…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in dev/testing/microsoft-agents-testing/tests/cl…
info Commented-code block (9 lines) in libraries/microsoft-agents-hosting-core/micro…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in libraries/microsoft-agents-hosting-dialogs/mi…

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 2 findings

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

2 matching findings on this repo

high Phantom test coverage: test_validation_missing_config tests/storage_cosmos/test_cosmos_db_config.py:152
low Stub function `CHANNEL_HOST_CONFIGURATION` (body is just `pass`/`return`) — lib…

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/7d6ce753-cd50-496e-aa8f-dc78c913089d/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/7d6ce753-cd50-496e-aa8f-dc78c913089d/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.