Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

superserve-ai/sandbox

https://github.com/superserve-ai/sandbox · scanned 2026-06-16 00:26 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

151 raw signals (106 security + 45 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 36 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 237 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
83.4
/100
Security checks
83
9 findings
System graph
83
100.0% cov · 27 findings
Critical
2
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 2 High 4 Medium 12 Low 15 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 9 System graph 27 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 26 Security 1 Software 1 Hardware 4 Frontend 1 Cicd 3
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 83.4/100 with 100.0% coverage. It contains 507 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 45 findings — concentrated in cicd (19), quality (18), hardware (4). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 22 medium. Recommended next step: open the cicd layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 33 of 36 actionable findings. 273 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical Security checks quality Practices conf 0.82 19 occurrences Foundry mined mock as real or placeholder: superserve-ai/sandbox
Graph query export: Mock, sample, placeholder, or self-attested behavior treated as real Query id: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for fake completeness and missing real data paths. Motif: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Training usage: hard_negative Graph gol…
19 occurrences
repo-level (19 hits)
critical Security checks security auth conf 0.78 18 occurrences Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: superserve-ai/sandbox
Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails Query id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI. Motif: security_auth_without_guardrails Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold labe…
18 occurrences
repo-level (18 hits)
high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.84 10 occurrences Foundry mined bad chains: superserve-ai/sandbox
Comment chain pattern product: bad_chains Repo: superserve-ai/sandbox Thread: superserve-ai/sandbox#87 Outcome: self_attested_unverified Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context Source graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, source_graph_h…
10 occurrences
repo-level (10 hits)
high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.80 Foundry mined docs only runtime fix: superserve-ai/sandbox
Graph query export: Docs-only response to runtime or integration issue Query id: docs_only_runtime_fix Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check examples where docs or claims are not enough proof. Motif: docs_only_runtime_fix Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold label: weak_supervisio…
high Security checks quality Quality conf 0.76 21 occurrences Foundry mined schema ui api mismatch: superserve-ai/sandbox
Graph query export: Schema, UI, and API mismatch Query id: schema_ui_api_mismatch Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check examples for data-path consistency across layers. Motif: schema_ui_api_mismatch Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold label: supported_by_verification_signal Repo…
21 occurrences
repo-level (21 hits)
high Security checks quality Testing conf 0.78 18 occurrences Foundry mined test ci gap after feedback: superserve-ai/sandbox
Graph query export: Feedback exposes missing tests or CI Query id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for feedback/fix chains without adequate guardrails. Motif: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Training usage: hard_negative Graph gold label: supported_by_verificati…
18 occurrences
repo-level (18 hits)
medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.62 69 occurrences Foundry mined assumption checks: superserve-ai/sandbox
Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks Repo: superserve-ai/sandbox Thread: superserve-ai/sandbox#99 Outcome: claimed_resolved_unverified Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context Source graph label: source_backed_multi_signal_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, sour…
69 occurrences
repo-level (69 hits)
medium Security checks quality maintenance conf 0.70 61 occurrences Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: superserve-ai/sandbox
Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps Query id: blueprint_gap_alignment Query type: motif_query Intent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps. Motif: blueprint_gap_alignment Training usage: curriculum_gap Graph gold label: …
61 occurrences
repo-level (61 hits)
medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.70 11 occurrences Foundry mined unresolved feedback: superserve-ai/sandbox
Graph query export: Human feedback without linked fix evidence Query id: unresolved_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Negative/unresolved examples that should not be hallucinated into fixes. Motif: unlinked_feedback_needs_evidence Training usage: negative_or_unresolved Graph gold label: weak…
11 occurrences
repo-level (11 hits)
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected
A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.
CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph hardware Security conf 1.00 Dockerfile runs as root: Dockerfile
No non-root USER set. Containers running as root expand the blast radius of any vulnerability inside the image.
Container
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 12 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
google-github-actions/auth@v2 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
3 files, 12 locations
.github/workflows/deploy-api.yml:54, 60, 120, 126 (4 hits)
.github/workflows/deploy-proxy.yml:49, 55, 94, 100 (4 hits)
.github/workflows/deploy-vmd.yml:64, 70, 109, 115 (4 hits)
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 3 occurrences GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
3 files, 3 locations
.github/workflows/deploy-api.yml
.github/workflows/deploy-proxy.yml
.github/workflows/deploy-vmd.yml
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — .github/workflows/scripts/deploy-proxy.py:55
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — .github/workflows/scripts/deploy-vmd.py:36
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — deploy/deploy-proxy.py:50
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected
Found 158 placeholder/mock markers across 11 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.
Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 8 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example
Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `PROXY_ALLOWED_ORIGINS`, `PROXY_DOMAIN`, `REQUIRE_DATA_PLANE`, `SANDBOX_ACCESS_TOKEN_SEED`, `TERMINAL_ALLOWED_ORIGINS`, `VMD_INSTALL_DIR`, `VMD_LABEL`, `VMD_SERVICE`. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboarding doesn't break.
config drift
low System graph hardware Coverage conf 1.00 Containers defined but no K8s/orchestration manifest found
Repo has Dockerfiles/compose but no Kubernetes/Nomad manifests. If the target deployment is K8s, the manifests may live in a separate ops repo.
Deployment
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 36 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: alpine:3.21
Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.
Dockerfile:14 containersPinned dependencies
low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: golang:1.25-alpine3.21
Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.
Dockerfile:4 containersPinned dependencies
low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 4 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
actions/setup-go@v5 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
2 files, 4 locations
.github/workflows/deploy-proxy.yml:38, 83 (2 hits)
.github/workflows/deploy-vmd.yml:47, 95 (2 hits)
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
low System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Low test-to-source ratio
33 tests / 206 src (ratio 0.16).
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 3 occurrences Possibly dead Python function: deploy
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
3 files, 3 locations
.github/workflows/scripts/deploy-proxy.py:78
.github/workflows/scripts/deploy-vmd.py:103
deploy/deploy-proxy.py:75
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: internal/api/handlers.go (2090 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: internal/api/handlers_test.go (2180 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: internal/integration/integration_test.go (1768 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: internal/vm/fc/client/operations/operations_client.go (1736 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: internal/vm/manager.go (1739 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: proto/vmdpb/vmd.pb.go (3149 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/7e91aeeb-0adb-4dac-aef5-71478b2963af/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/7e91aeeb-0adb-4dac-aef5-71478b2963af/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.