Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

zuhthebeg/page

https://github.com/zuhthebeg/page · scanned 2026-06-16 01:13 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

22 raw signals (0 security + 22 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 22 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
70.1
/100
Security checks
70
0 findings
System graph
70
66.7% cov · 22 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 16 Low 4 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 22 Crowd 0 Layer: Data 1 Frontend 1 Security 12 Cicd 1 Quality 7
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 70.1/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 97 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 22 findings — concentrated in security (12), quality (7), data (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 16 medium. Recommended next step: open the security layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 20 of 22 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests, operator-readme. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in public/admin/index.html:83
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
public/admin/index.html:83 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in public/edit/index.html:112
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
public/edit/index.html:112 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in public/index.html:256
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
public/index.html:256 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in public/marryme/index.html:105
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
public/marryme/index.html:105 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in public/new/index.html:153
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
public/new/index.html:153 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in public/subway-dice/index.html:331
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
public/subway-dice/index.html:331 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in seed/yang.html:669
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
seed/yang.html:669 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in seed/yang.rendered.html:669
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
seed/yang.rendered.html:669 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'local_storage_auth_token' in public/admin/index.html:69
Found a known-risky pattern (local_storage_auth_token). Review and replace if possible.
public/admin/index.html:69 Local storage auth token
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'local_storage_auth_token' in public/edit/index.html:100
Found a known-risky pattern (local_storage_auth_token). Review and replace if possible.
public/edit/index.html:100 Local storage auth token
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'local_storage_auth_token' in public/index.html:245
Found a known-risky pattern (local_storage_auth_token). Review and replace if possible.
public/index.html:245 Local storage auth token
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'local_storage_auth_token' in public/new/index.html:140
Found a known-risky pattern (local_storage_auth_token). Review and replace if possible.
public/new/index.html:140 Local storage auth token
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
medium System graph data Coverage conf 1.00 ORM models found but no DB engine detected
The repo defines tables/models but no DB connection string was found. Likely lives in env vars or a config file the scanner didn't read.
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 12 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 10 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Docs conf 1.00 README lacks setup or run instructions
A README exists, but it does not contain common install/setup/run markers. This matches a frequent generated-code pattern: UI is present, operational handoff is thin.
ReadmeRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/7f35e1b0-5bc9-4243-8442-754ef84d74b5/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/7f35e1b0-5bc9-4243-8442-754ef84d74b5/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.