Homebrew/homebrew-cask

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

25 of your 43 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask · scanned 2026-06-05 13:17 UTC (5 days, 6 hours ago) · 10 languages

105 raw signals (43 security + 62 graph) 11/13 scanners ran System graph score 82 (lower by 22)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days, 6 hours ago · v2 · 19 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 55 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

100.0% cov · 9 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	55.0	0.15	8.25
`security_score`	100.0	0.25	25.00
`testing_score`	0.0	0.20	0.00
`documentation_score`	60.0	0.15	9.00
`practices_score`	61.0	0.15	9.15
`code_quality`	80.0	0.10	8.00
Overall		1.00	59.4

security_score may be inflated — optional security scanners were skipped on this fast scan

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 5 Medium 6 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 10 System graph 9 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 8 Software 4 Cicd 3 Api 1 Frontend 1 Security 2

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Scan summary Quality grade C (59/100). Dimensions: security 100, maintainability 55. 43 findings (23 security). 10,902 lines analyzed.

Showing 14 of 19 actionable findings. 74 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility [MINED126] Workflow container/services image `ghcr.io/homebrew/brew:main` unpinned: `container/services image: ghcr.io/homebrew/brew:main` without `@sha256:...` pulls a mutable tag at workflow-run time. Treat workflow container references with the same supply-chain discipline as Dockerfile FROM lines.

Replace with `ghcr.io/homebrew/brew:main@sha256:<digest>`. Re-pin via Dependabot Docker scope.

.github/workflows/actionlint.yml:33

Replace with `ghcr.io/homebrew/brew:main@sha256:<digest>`. Re-pin via Dependabot Docker scope.

.github/workflows/clean-up-closed-prs.yml:29

high Security checks cicd CI/CD security conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility 21 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

[MINED115] Action `Homebrew/actions/setup-homebrew` pinned to mutable ref `@main`: `uses: Homebrew/actions/setup-homebrew@main` resolves at workflow-run time. Tags and branches can be re-pushed by the action owner; that made the tj-actions/changed-files compromise (2025) instantly affect ~23K repos…

9 files, 21 locations

.github/workflows/remove-disabled-packages.yml:33, 40, 45, 55, 62 (5 hits)

.github/workflows/autobump.yml:25, 31, 36 (3 hits)

.github/workflows/google-fonts.yml:51, 56, 97 (3 hits)

.github/workflows/actionlint.yml:37, 41 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/ci.yml:47, 90 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/scheduled.yml:32, 71 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/triage.yml:17, 21 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/cache.yml:32

CI/CD securitySupply chainGitHub Actions

high System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 20 occurrences GitHub Action tracks a moving branch

Homebrew/actions/setup-homebrew@main can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

9 files, 20 locations

.github/workflows/remove-disabled-packages.yml:33, 40, 45, 55, 62 (5 hits)

.github/workflows/autobump.yml:25, 31, 36 (3 hits)

.github/workflows/google-fonts.yml:51, 56, 97 (3 hits)

.github/workflows/ci.yml:47, 90 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/scheduled.yml:32, 71 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/triage.yml:17, 21 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/actionlint.yml:37

.github/workflows/cache.yml:32

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 1.00 [CFG006] Missing .gitignore: No .gitignore file. Risk of committing secrets and build artifacts.

Add a .gitignore appropriate for your language/framework.

medium Security checks quality Quality conf 0.78 Suspicious implementation file appears unreferenced

Confirm whether this file is reachable. If not, delete it; if yes, wire it through explicit imports, routes, or entry points and add a test that proves the path executes.

Casks/a/arq-cloud-backup.rb:1

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 4 occurrences GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

4 files, 4 locations

.github/workflows/clean-up-closed-prs.yml

.github/workflows/google-fonts.yml

.github/workflows/remove-disabled-packages.yml

.github/workflows/stale-issues.yml

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'weak_hash' in Casks/k/konica-minolta-bizhub-c750i-driver.rb:31

Found a known-risky pattern (weak_hash). Review and replace if possible.

Casks/k/konica-minolta-bizhub-c750i-driver.rb:31 Weak hash

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'weak_hash' in Casks/k/konica-minolta-bizhub-c759-c658-c368-c287-c3851-driver.rb:31

Found a known-risky pattern (weak_hash). Review and replace if possible.

Casks/k/konica-minolta-bizhub-c759-c658-c368-c287-c3851-driver.rb:31 Weak hash

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 2 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low Security checks quality Quality conf 0.60 14 occurrences Duplicated implementation block across source files

Duplicate implementation blocks are maintenance debt. Keep them visible, but they are not a high-severity defect unless the duplicated logic is security-sensitive or drifting.

12 files, 12 locations

Casks/1/[email protected]:23

Casks/a/[email protected]:10

Casks/a/[email protected]:4

Casks/a/[email protected]:15

Casks/a/[email protected]:16

duplicationquality

high Security checks quality Quality conf 0.62 Source file name looks like an AI patch artifact

Rename it to the domain concept it implements or merge it into the existing module it was meant to change.

Casks/a/arq-cloud-backup.rb:1

low System graph software Dead code candidate conf 1.00 File has no detected symbols: developer/cgi/check_url_filename.py

Source file with no class/function declarations — possible config, dead code, or scratch file.

low System graph software Dead code candidate conf 1.00 File has no detected symbols: developer/cgi/check_url_redirect.py

Source file with no class/function declarations — possible config, dead code, or scratch file.

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/80dd63bd-b6ad-4fe1-a05b-3a909faa9cb0/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/80dd63bd-b6ad-4fe1-a05b-3a909faa9cb0/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.