Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

andressalame/profesormvt-web

https://github.com/andressalame/profesormvt-web · scanned 2026-06-17 01:33 UTC (1 month, 2 weeks ago)

12 raw signals (0 security + 12 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 2 weeks ago · v2 · last Δ -7.7 (diff) · 12 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 12 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 8 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 12 Crowd 0 Layer: Data 1 Frontend 1 Security 4 Cicd 1 Quality 5

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 69.0/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 110 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 12 findings — concentrated in quality (5), security (4), data (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 8 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 11 of 12 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — worker/index.js:293

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected

A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.

CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in public/admin/crm/index.html:559

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

public/admin/crm/index.html:559 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in public/alumnos/index.html:665

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

public/alumnos/index.html:665 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'insert_adjacent_html' in public/admin/crm/index.html:910

Found a known-risky pattern (insert_adjacent_html). Review and replace if possible.

public/admin/crm/index.html:910 Insert adjacent html

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'insert_adjacent_html' in public/alumnos/index.html:925

Found a known-risky pattern (insert_adjacent_html). Review and replace if possible.

public/alumnos/index.html:925 Insert adjacent html

medium System graph data Coverage conf 1.00 ORM models found but no DB engine detected

The repo defines tables/models but no DB connection string was found. Likely lives in env vars or a config file the scanner didn't read.

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 4 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

actions/setup-node@v4 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

.github/workflows/deploy.yml:16 CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected

No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/81a8dca7-8e1e-4030-bd10-867133ebb30d/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/81a8dca7-8e1e-4030-bd10-867133ebb30d/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.