Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
27 of your 49 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.
Upstream (GitHub) caused delay on this scan — not Repobility.
  • GitHub API rate-limited (HTTP 403) — preflight skipped, fell back to direct git clone.
  • Clone from GitHub took 98.33s for a 109.9 MB repo slow.
  • Repobility's analysis ran in 2.75s after the clone landed.

SunOner/sunone_aimbot_2

https://github.com/SunOner/sunone_aimbot_2 · scanned 2026-06-05 20:02 UTC (4 days, 15 hours ago) · 10 languages

71 raw signals (49 security + 22 graph) 11/13 scanners ran 5th percentile · C · large (100-500K LoC) System graph score 99 (lower by 44)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 15 hours ago · v2 · 23 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 37 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 55.0 0.15 8.25
security_score 100.0 0.25 25.00
testing_score 0.0 0.20 0.00
documentation_score 70.0 0.15 10.50
practices_score 40.0 0.15 6.00
code_quality 50.0 0.10 5.00
Overall 1.00 54.8
security_score may be inflated — optional security scanners were skipped on this fast scan
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 2 findings
What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.
Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.
How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.
Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.
2 matching findings on this repo
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 5 places
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 4 places
View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →
Config drift 1 finding
What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.
Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.
How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.
Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.
1 matching finding on this repo
  • medium No CI/CD configuration found
View all config drift findings →
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/831619c5-9663-4e3c-8f87-4168217b746f/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/831619c5-9663-4e3c-8f87-4168217b746f/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.