Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
4 of your 8 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 2.6s · analysis 1.86s · 0.3 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning

https://github.com/josephmisiti/awesome-machine-learning · scanned 2026-06-05 08:08 UTC (5 days, 20 hours ago) · 10 languages

18 raw signals (6 security + 12 graph) 76th percentile · Python · tiny (<2K LoC) System graph score 81 (lower by 7)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days, 20 hours ago · v2 · 10 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 2 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 30.0 0.15 4.50
security_score 100.0 0.25 25.00
testing_score 70.0 0.20 14.00
documentation_score 75.0 0.15 11.25
practices_score 70.0 0.15 10.50
code_quality 80.0 0.10 8.00
Overall 1.00 73.2
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Scan summary Quality grade B (73/100). Dimensions: security 100, maintainability 30. 6 findings (3 security). 30 lines analyzed.

Showing 6 of 10 actionable findings. 12 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 1.00 [CFG006] Missing .gitignore: No .gitignore file. Risk of committing secrets and build artifacts.
Add a .gitignore appropriate for your language/framework.
medium Security checks software dependencies conf 0.90 ✓ Repobility 3 occurrences requirements.txt: `pyquery` has no version pin
Unpinned pip requirement means every fresh install may resolve a different version. Newer releases can introduce malicious code (typosquats, account compromises). Reproducible installs need exact pins.
lines 1, 2, 3
scripts/requirements.txt:1, 2, 3 (3 hits)
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). Either auth lives in custom code, in a separate service, or is missing.
auth
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 1 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph software Dead code candidate conf 1.00 File has no detected symbols: scripts/pull_R_packages.py
Source file with no class/function declarations — possible config, dead code, or scratch file.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/83ab57d9-cb5a-4a65-ae28-53668193f1a0/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/83ab57d9-cb5a-4a65-ae28-53668193f1a0/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.