Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

yuniwon/pixel-slime-clicker

https://github.com/yuniwon/pixel-slime-clicker · scanned 2026-06-16 01:09 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

19 raw signals (7 security + 12 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 17 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 3 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 12 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 2 Medium 8 Low 4 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 5 System graph 12 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 11 Frontend 2 Security 3 Cicd 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 97.3/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 175 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 12 findings — concentrated in quality (6), security (3), frontend (2). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 6 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 15 of 17 actionable findings. 20 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical Security checks quality Practices conf 0.82 Foundry mined mock as real or placeholder: yuniwon/pixel-slime-clicker

Graph query export: Mock, sample, placeholder, or self-attested behavior treated as real Query id: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for fake completeness and missing real data paths. Motif: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Training usage: hard_negative Graph gol…

high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.84 Foundry mined bad chains: yuniwon/pixel-slime-clicker

Comment chain pattern product: bad_chains Repo: yuniwon/pixel-slime-clicker Thread: yuniwon/pixel-slime-clicker#3 Outcome: self_attested_unverified Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_arti…

high Security checks quality Quality conf 0.76 Foundry mined schema ui api mismatch: yuniwon/pixel-slime-clicker

Graph query export: Schema, UI, and API mismatch Query id: schema_ui_api_mismatch Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check examples for data-path consistency across layers. Motif: schema_ui_api_mismatch Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_review Repo: y…

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.62 2 occurrences Foundry mined assumption checks: yuniwon/pixel-slime-clicker

Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks Repo: yuniwon/pixel-slime-clicker Thread: yuniwon/pixel-slime-clicker#2 Outcome: claimed_resolved_unverified Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has…

2 occurrences

repo-level (2 hits)

medium Security checks quality maintenance conf 0.70 3 occurrences Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: yuniwon/pixel-slime-clicker

Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps Query id: blueprint_gap_alignment Query type: motif_query Intent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps. Motif: blueprint_gap_alignment Training usage: curriculum_gap Graph gold label: …

3 occurrences

repo-level (3 hits)

medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in index.html:5135

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

index.html:5135 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'insert_adjacent_html' in index.html:8935

Found a known-risky pattern (insert_adjacent_html). Review and replace if possible.

index.html:8935 Insert adjacent html

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.

auth

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 3 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 7 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected

No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — tools/gen-icons.js:112

Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak

Fq console leak

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/8a599257-601f-4a32-b753-63628f0a0496/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/8a599257-601f-4a32-b753-63628f0a0496/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.