← Back to scan
File as GitHub Issue repo: telagod/code-abyss

Push this scan report to telagod/code-abyss

Click the green button below to open GitHub’s new-issue form, pre-filled with the report title, summary table, top findings, and an embedded score-card image. No authentication needed — you review on GitHub before submitting. Repobility is credited as the scanner.

Embedded score card image

This image will render at the top of the issue body. Hosted on Repobility, refreshes automatically after re-scans.

Repobility score card

Issue title

ZipSlip — Archive Path Traversal

Curate findings to include

Pick exactly which findings appear in the issue body. By default the top 5 are included. Uncheck noise, check what matters.

Top 5 (default)
Severity Rule Title File:line
HIGH SEC013 [SEC013] Path Traversal — User Input in File Path: User-controlled input used in file pat… skills/processing-pdfs/scripts/create_v…:16
MED ERR001 [ERR001] Silent Exception Swallowing: Silently swallowing all exceptions hides bugs. Even… skills/creating-presentations/scripts/r…:124
MED ERR001 [ERR001] Silent Exception Swallowing: Silently swallowing all exceptions hides bugs. Even… skills/creating-presentations/scripts/i…:384
MED SEC012 [SEC012] ZipSlip — Archive Path Traversal: Archive extraction without path validation all… skills/processing-docx/ooxml/scripts/va…:891
MED SEC012 [SEC012] ZipSlip — Archive Path Traversal: Archive extraction without path validation all… skills/processing-docx/ooxml/scripts/va…:70
MED SEC012 [SEC012] ZipSlip — Archive Path Traversal: Archive extraction without path validation all… skills/processing-docx/ooxml/scripts/un…:17
MED AGT014 Codex auth.json is read or copied without visible secret-file hardening bin/adapters/codex.js:464
Reset to top 5 7 findings available (after auto-suppression of test files + won't-fix)

Issue body (markdown)

## Code-quality scan: `telagod/code-abyss`

**Score: 82/100 (B+)**  ·  9 findings  ·  scanned 2026-05-16 08:42 UTC  ·  16,456 LOC

| Severity | Count |
|---|---|
| CRITICAL | 0 |
| HIGH | 1 |
| MEDIUM | 6 |
| LOW | 0 |

📊 [Full filterable report](https://repobility.com/scan/8ccc99bd-26dd-4cf2-b4e8-79ed2b59c3b0/)  ·  ![scorecard](https://repobility.com/scan/8ccc99bd-26dd-4cf2-b4e8-79ed2b59c3b0/report.png?v=1778920920-s2)

### Top findings

1. **HIGH** `SEC013` — Path Traversal — User Input in File Path
   `skills/processing-pdfs/scripts/create_validation_image.py:16` · A01:2021 Broken Access Control (path traversal)
2. **MEDIUM** `ERR001` — Silent Exception Swallowing
   `skills/creating-presentations/scripts/rearrange.py:124`
3. **MEDIUM** `ERR001` — Silent Exception Swallowing
   `skills/creating-presentations/scripts/inventory.py:384`
4. **MEDIUM** `SEC012` — ZipSlip — Archive Path Traversal
   `skills/processing-docx/ooxml/scripts/validation/base.py:891` · A01:2021 Broken Access Control (path traversal)
5. **MEDIUM** `SEC012` — ZipSlip — Archive Path Traversal
   `skills/processing-docx/ooxml/scripts/validation/redlining.py:70` · A01:2021 Broken Access Control (path traversal)

---

**Security note**: this issue is public. If any flagged finding is a real, exploitable vulnerability, please redirect to your `SECURITY.md` policy or open a [private security advisory](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/security-advisories/guidance-on-reporting-and-writing-information-about-vulnerabilities/privately-reporting-a-security-vulnerability) instead. We're happy to close this and re-submit privately.

---

_Filed automatically. Close this issue if not useful — we won't refile. Full report: https://repobility.com/scan/8ccc99bd-26dd-4cf2-b4e8-79ed2b59c3b0/_
Premium account
This scan was submitted by a Enterprise-tier account. Premium accounts have full outreach control â Repobility doesn't pre-fill the 'file as GitHub issue' button for paid users. You can still file the issue manually using the markdown body above (Copy markdown), or contact us if you'd like batch-filing enabled for your account.
Megaproject â high spam risk
Could not determine 'telagod/code-abyss' star count (GitHub API rate-limited or unreachable). When in doubt about repo size, prefer opening a focused PR or a discussion rather than an issue.
I read the warnings â override Cancel

The button opens GitHubâs new-issue page in a new tab. You will see the title + body pre-filled â review, edit if you want, then click GitHubâs "Submit new issue" button. Repobility never posts anything on your behalf.

For real security findings on big repos: use the project's SECURITY.md or private advisory flow instead of a public issue.