Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

ong6/sg-property-analysis

https://github.com/ong6/sg-property-analysis · scanned 2026-06-16 04:35 UTC (1 month, 3 weeks ago)

33 raw signals (0 security + 33 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 32 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 1 repeated signal grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
75.1
/100
Security checks
75
0 findings
System graph
75
44.4% cov · 32 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 7 Low 18 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 32 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 7 Security 3 Quality 22
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 75.1/100 with 44.4% coverage. It contains 279 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 33 findings — concentrated in quality (23), software (7), security (3). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 7 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 25 of 32 actionable findings. 33 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .mcp.json
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.mcp.json VerificationMcp config
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing ci, tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in ui.py:755
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
ui.py:755 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_outerhtml_assignment' in dashboard.py:721
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_outerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
dashboard.py:721 Direct outerhtml assignment
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected
Found 12 placeholder/mock markers across 5 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.
Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 549 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Low test-to-source ratio
2 tests / 15 src (ratio 0.13).
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 2 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: profile_memory.py:load_index, eval_memory.py:load_index This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
2 occurrences
repo-level (2 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `days_old` in invest.py:224
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `days_old` in ui.py:143
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `n_old` in backtest.py:170
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: do_GET
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
dashboard.py:848
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: do_GET
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
ui.py:973
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: do_POST
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
dashboard.py:868
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: do_POST
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
ui.py:986
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: log_message
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
dashboard.py:884
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: log_message
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
ui.py:1004
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: match_stack
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
profile_memory.py:340
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Stub function `log_message` (body is just `pass`/`return`) — dashboard.py:884
Likely an AI scaffold that was never filled in. Remove or implement.
Empty handlerDead code
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: backtest_ext.py (1948 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: invest.py (2118 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: ui.py (1054 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/90ced593-c542-4db6-82e8-824a65179ca4/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/90ced593-c542-4db6-82e8-824a65179ca4/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.