podman-container-tools/podman

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

19 of your 59 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

https://github.com/podman-container-tools/podman · scanned 2026-06-05 13:17 UTC (5 days, 8 hours ago) · 10 languages

196 raw signals (56 security + 140 graph) 11/13 scanners ran 56th percentile · Go · medium (20-100K LoC)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 5 days, 8 hours ago · v2 · 81 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 41 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

88.9% cov · 60 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	85.0	0.15	12.75
`security_score`	100.0	0.25	25.00
`testing_score`	27.0	0.20	5.40
`documentation_score`	68.0	0.15	10.20
`practices_score`	60.0	0.15	9.00
`code_quality`	80.0	0.10	8.00
Overall		1.00	70.3

security_score may be inflated — optional security scanners were skipped on this fast scan

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 2 High 5 Medium 21 Low 36 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 21 System graph 60 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 50 Software 6 Security 6 Cicd 2 Network 4 Hardware 12 Frontend 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 1 finding

What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.

Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.

How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.

Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.

1 matching finding on this repo

low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places repo-level

View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →

Commented-out code 2 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

2 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (6 lines) in test/apiv2/python/rest_api/test_v2_0_0_image.…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in docs/source/conf.py:103

View all commented-out code findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/921f2ee3-abc8-491a-9606-0dbbad94170d/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/921f2ee3-abc8-491a-9606-0dbbad94170d/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.