Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

dav204/crude-tanker-fv

https://github.com/dav204/crude-tanker-fv · scanned 2026-06-17 01:53 UTC (1 month, 1 week ago)

38 raw signals (0 security + 38 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 1 week ago · v2 · last Δ -18.8 (diff) · 37 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 1 repeated signal grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
57.9
/100
Security checks
58
0 findings
System graph
58
44.4% cov · 37 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 16 Low 6 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 37 Crowd 0 Layer: Network 9 Security 1 Quality 27
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 57.9/100 with 44.4% coverage. It contains 1014 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 38 findings — concentrated in quality (28), network (9), security (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 16 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 22 of 37 actionable findings. 38 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/commands/add-ticker.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.claude/commands/add-ticker.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/commands/reconcile.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.claude/commands/reconcile.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: CLAUDE.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
CLAUDE.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license, ci. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — src/crude_tanker_fv/ffa_ocr.py:78
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 10 in use
Port 10 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
inputs/data_sources.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 12 in use
Port 12 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
inputs/fleet_manifests/ccec.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 14 in use
Port 14 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
inputs/market_data/prices_daily.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 16 in use
Port 16 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
inputs/fleet_manifests/eco.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 18 in use
Port 18 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
scripts/price_refresh_cron.sh Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 20 in use
Port 20 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
inputs/market_data/prices_daily.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 30 in use
Port 30 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
scripts/price_refresh_cron.sh Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 33 in use
Port 33 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
inputs/fleet_manifests/fro.yaml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 82 in use
Port 82 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
inputs/dividend_policies/trmd.yaml Ports
low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 153 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 2 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: src/crude_tanker_fv/pipeline.py:run_watchlist, src/crude_tanker_fv/pipeline.py:run_transaction_anchored_comparison This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or docum…
2 occurrences
repo-level (2 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: src/crude_tanker_fv/carveout.py:carved_price, src/crude_tanker_fv/carveout.py:carved_price, src/crude_tanker_fv/carveout.py:carved_price This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene)…
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `slope_old` in tests/test_nav.py:66
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/9477a048-bd93-45e1-822d-e0e1c1a891c4/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/9477a048-bd93-45e1-822d-e0e1c1a891c4/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.