Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

cskaa/ai-superposition

https://github.com/cskaa/ai-superposition · scanned 2026-06-17 01:52 UTC (1 month, 1 week ago)

32 raw signals (0 security + 32 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 1 week ago · v2 · last Δ +6.9 (diff) · 23 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 9 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
83.6
/100
Security checks
84
0 findings
System graph
84
66.7% cov · 23 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 3 Medium 5 Low 9 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 23 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 4 Frontend 3 Security 4 Quality 12
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 83.6/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 379 nodes across 14 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 32 findings — concentrated in quality (21), software (4), security (4). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 3 high, 5 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 17 of 23 actionable findings. 32 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high System graph security auth conf 1.00 FastAPI POST `create_decision` without auth dependency — backend/app/api/routes.py:56
`@router.post` decorator with no `Depends(get_current_user)` or auth-shaped dependency in its signature. Mutating endpoints should require authentication unless explicitly public.
backend/app/api/routes.py:56 securityAuth fastapi unauth mutation
high System graph security auth conf 1.00 FastAPI POST `create_twin` without auth dependency — backend/app/api/routes.py:36
`@router.post` decorator with no `Depends(get_current_user)` or auth-shaped dependency in its signature. Mutating endpoints should require authentication unless explicitly public.
backend/app/api/routes.py:36 securityAuth fastapi unauth mutation
high System graph security auth conf 1.00 FastAPI POST `simulate_decision` without auth dependency — backend/app/api/routes.py:80
`@router.post` decorator with no `Depends(get_current_user)` or auth-shaped dependency in its signature. Mutating endpoints should require authentication unless explicitly public.
backend/app/api/routes.py:80 securityAuth fastapi unauth mutation
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license, ci. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected
Found 26 placeholder/mock markers across 4 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.
Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
3 test file(s) for 52 source file(s) (ratio 0.06). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 10 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: backend/app/store.py:put_twin, backend/app/store.py:put_twin This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
10 occurrences
repo-level (10 hits)
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 4 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: backend/app/agents/heuristics.py:cfo_report, backend/app/agents/heuristics.py:cmo_report, backend/app/agents/heuristics.py:risk_report, backend/app/agents/heuristics.py:market_intel_report This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in v…
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `model_copy` in backend/app/store.py:208
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: cfo_report
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
backend/app/agents/heuristics.py:108
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: cmo_report
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
backend/app/agents/heuristics.py:163
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: market_intel_report
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
backend/app/agents/heuristics.py:283
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: risk_report
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
backend/app/agents/heuristics.py:227
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/9748b78b-d26b-4ca7-849f-7674ab5b2ad4/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/9748b78b-d26b-4ca7-849f-7674ab5b2ad4/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.