Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

bennettbwalter-dot/emergency-tradesmen-v2

https://github.com/bennettbwalter-dot/emergency-tradesmen-v2 · scanned 2026-06-17 01:45 UTC (1 month, 1 week ago)

1118 raw signals (0 security + 1118 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 1 week ago · v2 · last Δ -24.0 (diff) · 1053 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 65 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

100.0% cov · 1053 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 24 Medium 146 Low 832 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 1053 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 18 Frontend 802 Security 33 Cicd 1 Quality 172 Api 27

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 6 findings

What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.

Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.

How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.

Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.

6 matching findings on this repo

low Near-duplicate function bodies in 4 places
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 5 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 6 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 11 places
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places repo-level

View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →

Legacy markers 3 findings

What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.

Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.

How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.

Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.

3 matching findings on this repo

low Old/deprecated-named symbol `unstable_legacy` in public/showroom-templates/plum…
low Old/deprecated-named symbol `unstable_legacy` in public/showroom-templates/brea…
low Old/deprecated-named symbol `unstable_legacy` in public/showroom-templates/v0-c…

View all legacy markers findings →

Commented-out code 29 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

12 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (7 lines) in scripts/fix_index_visuals.py:25
info Commented-code block (25 lines) in scripts/recover_mojibake.py:7
info Commented-code block (8 lines) in scripts/insert_phase5_tier3.py:49
info Commented-code block (9 lines) in scripts/insert_gas_drain_nw.py:31
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/finalize-dev-account.js:75
info Commented-code block (10 lines) in scripts/test_rpc.js:14
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/fill_usa_gaps.py:310
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in scripts/audit_uk_data_integrity.py:36
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/audit_uk_duplicates.py:91
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/audit_uk_locations.py:79
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/repair_chat_interface.py:18
info Commented-code block (15 lines) in scripts/repair_index.py:35

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 3 findings

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

3 matching findings on this repo

low Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — scripts/apply-stripe-config.js:27
medium Insecure pattern 'node_child_process' in scripts/apply-stripe-config.js:4 scripts/apply-stripe-config.js:4
medium Runtime service client appears to use placeholder configuration

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/9bcac54d-f7df-4c2d-a6f1-d3087926feb1/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/9bcac54d-f7df-4c2d-a6f1-d3087926feb1/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.