Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

Sompote/TigrimOSR

https://github.com/Sompote/TigrimOSR · scanned 2026-06-16 00:17 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

41 raw signals (0 security + 41 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 41 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
62.6
/100
Security checks
63
0 findings
System graph
63
88.9% cov · 41 findings
Critical
1
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 1 High 3 Medium 10 Low 25 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 41 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 4 Hardware 4 Frontend 1 Security 7 Cicd 1 Quality 24
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 62.6/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 221 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 41 findings — concentrated in quality (24), security (7), software (4). Risk profile is high: 1 critical, 3 high, 10 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 39 of 41 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical System graph security Secrets conf 1.00 Possible secret in src/vm/manager.rs
Detected pattern matching password_literal. Rotate the credential and move to a secret manager.
src/vm/manager.rs:1296
high System graph security Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: assets/skills/env-check/SKILL.md
Agent-facing files are routinely pasted into LLM/tool contexts. Move literal tokens, keys, and passwords into a secret manager or document them as placeholders only.
assets/skills/env-check/SKILL.md:116 SecretsSkill file
high System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'eval_used' in src/server/services/toolbox.rs:3333
Found a known-risky pattern (eval_used). Review and replace if possible.
src/server/services/toolbox.rs:3333 Eval used
high System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'exec_used' in src/server/services/toolbox.rs:3333
Found a known-risky pattern (exec_used). Review and replace if possible.
src/server/services/toolbox.rs:3333 Exec used
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: assets/skills/code-review/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
assets/skills/code-review/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: assets/skills/literature-review/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
assets/skills/literature-review/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: assets/skills/python-bar-chart-generator/SKILL.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
assets/skills/python-bar-chart-generator/SKILL.md VerificationSkill file
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph hardware Security conf 1.00 Dockerfile runs as root: Dockerfile
No non-root USER set. Containers running as root expand the blast radius of any vulnerability inside the image.
Container
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in src/server/routes/files.rs:447
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
src/server/routes/files.rs:447 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in static/index.html:1270
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
static/index.html:1270 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'local_storage_auth_token' in static/index.html:1143
Found a known-risky pattern (local_storage_auth_token). Review and replace if possible.
static/index.html:1143 Local storage auth token
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 58 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 5 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example
Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `CLAWDBOT_EMAIL`, `OPENALEX_API_KEY`, `SEMANTIC_SCHOLAR_API_KEY`, `TWITTER_API_KEY`, `USER_EMAIL`. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboarding doesn't break.
config drift
low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph hardware Coverage conf 1.00 Containers defined but no K8s/orchestration manifest found
Repo has Dockerfiles/compose but no Kubernetes/Nomad manifests. If the target deployment is K8s, the manifests may live in a separate ops repo.
Deployment
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 38 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: debian:bookworm-slim
Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.
Dockerfile:24 containersPinned dependencies
low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: rust:1-bookworm
Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.
Dockerfile:8 containersPinned dependencies
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: assets/skills/web-search/scripts/search.py:search_text, assets/skills/web-search/scripts/search.py:search_news This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document …
duplicatesduplication
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: format_image_results
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
assets/skills/web-search/scripts/search.py:284
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: format_news_results
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
assets/skills/web-search/scripts/search.py:233
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: format_text_results
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
assets/skills/web-search/scripts/search.py:186
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: format_video_results
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
assets/skills/web-search/scripts/search.py:332
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/server/services/compact.rs (1546 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/server/services/skill_synthesizer.rs (2056 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/server/services/toolbox.rs (9053 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/ui/agents_view.rs (1720 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/ui/chat.rs (5753 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/ui/files_view.rs (2040 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/ui/output_panel.rs (2217 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/ui/projects_view.rs (2014 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/ui/remote_view.rs (1564 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/ui/settings.rs (3698 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/ui/skills_view.rs (1980 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/ui/tasks_view.rs (1601 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/vm/manager.rs (1540 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/a0126365-767d-41e0-bb0a-6ebb282522f5/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/a0126365-767d-41e0-bb0a-6ebb282522f5/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.