Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun

https://github.com/SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun · scanned 2026-06-16 00:01 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago)

44 raw signals (14 security + 30 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 36 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 19 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
97.9
/100
Security checks
98
6 findings
System graph
98
77.8% cov · 30 findings
Critical
1
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 1 High 3 Medium 13 Low 7 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 6 System graph 30 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 26 Software 1 Frontend 2 Security 6 Cicd 1
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 97.9/100 with 77.8% coverage. It contains 410 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 30 findings — concentrated in quality (20), security (6), frontend (2). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 11 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 24 of 36 actionable findings. 55 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical Security checks quality Practices conf 0.82 Foundry mined mock as real or placeholder: SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun
Graph query export: Mock, sample, placeholder, or self-attested behavior treated as real Query id: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for fake completeness and missing real data paths. Motif: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Training usage: hard_negative Graph gol…
high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.84 Foundry mined bad chains: SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun
Comment chain pattern product: bad_chains Repo: SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun Thread: SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun#3 Outcome: self_attested_unverified Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_arti…
high Security checks quality Quality conf 0.76 2 occurrences Foundry mined schema ui api mismatch: SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun
Graph query export: Schema, UI, and API mismatch Query id: schema_ui_api_mismatch Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check examples for data-path consistency across layers. Motif: schema_ui_api_mismatch Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold label: supported_by_verification_signal Repo…
2 occurrences
repo-level (2 hits)
high Security checks quality Testing conf 0.78 Foundry mined test ci gap after feedback: SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun
Graph query export: Feedback exposes missing tests or CI Query id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for feedback/fix chains without adequate guardrails. Motif: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Training usage: hard_negative Graph gold label: supported_by_verificati…
medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.62 12 occurrences Foundry mined assumption checks: SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun
Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks Repo: SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun Thread: SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun#9 Outcome: claimed_resolved_unverified Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has…
12 occurrences
repo-level (12 hits)
medium Security checks quality maintenance conf 0.70 8 occurrences Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: SamuelLClemens/NoRunJustFun
Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps Query id: blueprint_gap_alignment Query type: motif_query Intent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps. Motif: blueprint_gap_alignment Training usage: curriculum_gap Graph gold label: …
8 occurrences
repo-level (8 hits)
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — lib/three.module.min.js:6
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in js/dev.js:13
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
js/dev.js:13 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in js/learning-screen.js:109
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
js/learning-screen.js:109 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in js/main.js:88
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
js/main.js:88 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in scripts/validate_content.py:236
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
scripts/validate_content.py:236 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'insert_adjacent_html' in js/main.js:1221
Found a known-risky pattern (insert_adjacent_html). Review and replace if possible.
js/main.js:1221 Insert adjacent html
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 23 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: log_message
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scripts/serve.py:11
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — lib/three.module.min.js:6
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Stub function `log_message` (body is just `pass`/`return`) — scripts/serve.py:11
Likely an AI scaffold that was never filled in. Remove or implement.
Empty handlerDead code
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: js/main.js (1355 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: lib/jsm/loaders/GLTFLoader.js (4663 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/a0b4bd35-e25c-43f1-9120-874e7d876290/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/a0b4bd35-e25c-43f1-9120-874e7d876290/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.