Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

TheMorpheus407/morphcook

https://github.com/TheMorpheus407/morphcook · scanned 2026-06-16 00:34 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

18 raw signals (3 security + 15 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 16 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 4 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 13 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 1 Medium 5 Low 7 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 3 System graph 13 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 12 Security 1 Software 1 Frontend 1 Cicd 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 98.9/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 385 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 15 findings — concentrated in quality (12), software (1), frontend (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 4 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 14 of 16 actionable findings. 20 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical Security checks security auth conf 0.78 Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: TheMorpheus407/morphcook

Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails Query id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI. Motif: security_auth_without_guardrails Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold labe…

high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.84 2 occurrences Foundry mined bad chains: TheMorpheus407/morphcook

Comment chain pattern product: bad_chains Repo: TheMorpheus407/morphcook Thread: TheMorpheus407/morphcook#2 Outcome: not_resolved_or_not_observed Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_without_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_ar…

2 occurrences

repo-level (2 hits)

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.70 2 occurrences Foundry mined unresolved feedback: TheMorpheus407/morphcook

Graph query export: Human feedback without linked fix evidence Query id: unresolved_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Negative/unresolved examples that should not be hallucinated into fixes. Motif: unlinked_feedback_needs_evidence Training usage: negative_or_unresolved Graph gold label: need…

2 occurrences

repo-level (2 hits)

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data

A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.

Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — claude-fable-5/deploy/publish_play.py:60

`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 4 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 43 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 3 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: claude-fable-5/pipeline/wave4_lattice.py:walk, claude-fable-5/pipeline/wave4_lattice.py:walk This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separa…

3 occurrences

repo-level (3 hits)

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `ing_copy` in claude-fable-5/pipeline/wave4_lattice.py:1473

Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.

old markerDead code

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: key

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

claude-fable-5/pipeline/wave4_lattice.py:608

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: claude-fable-5/pipeline/wave4_lattice.py (1712 lines)

Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/a4e5168a-e473-4bcb-b267-5ca217394f18/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/a4e5168a-e473-4bcb-b267-5ca217394f18/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.