Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

falconisaacenrique-ui/warfront

https://github.com/falconisaacenrique-ui/warfront · scanned 2026-06-16 02:52 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

11 raw signals (0 security + 11 graph)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v2 · 11 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 91.4/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 28 nodes across 1 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 11 findings — concentrated in quality (10), cicd (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 3 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 6 of 11 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — proxy.ts:95
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 5 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example
Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `CI`, `NEXT_PUBLIC_APP_URL`, `NODE_ENV`, `PLAYWRIGHT_BASE_URL`, `VERCEL_AUTOMATION_BYPASS`. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboarding doesn't break.
config drift
low System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Low test-to-source ratio
1 tests / 6 src (ratio 0.17).
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/a77d61f8-705f-41cd-9376-8a7b1da863c8/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/a77d61f8-705f-41cd-9376-8a7b1da863c8/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.