Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

shihabshahrier/freelm

https://github.com/shihabshahrier/freelm · scanned 2026-06-16 00:10 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

18 raw signals (0 security + 18 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 14 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 4 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 14 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 2 Low 8 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 14 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 1 Frontend 2 Cicd 3 Quality 8

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 75.1/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 437 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 18 findings — concentrated in quality (12), cicd (3), frontend (2). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 2 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 10 of 14 actionable findings. 18 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish@release/v1 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

.github/workflows/release.yml:37 CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

.github/workflows/npm-release.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 9 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example

Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `FREELM_CACHE_DIR`, `FREELM_CACHE_TTL`, `FREELM_CEREBRAS_TIER`, `FREELM_GOOGLE_TIER`, `FREELM_GROQ_TIER`, `FREELM_MISTRAL_TIER`, `FREELM_NIM_TIER`, `FREELM_OPENROUTER_TIER` + 1 more. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboardi…

config drift

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 35 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

actions/setup-python@v5 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

.github/workflows/ci.yml:18 CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 5 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: src/freelm/client.py:from_env, src/freelm/client.py:from_env This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.

5 occurrences

repo-level (5 hits)

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 7 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: src/freelm/types_compat.py:model_dump, src/freelm/types_compat.py:model_dump, src/freelm/types_compat.py:model_dump, src/freelm/types_compat.py:model_dump This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.h…

duplicatesduplication

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: refresh_models

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

src/freelm/client.py:348

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — js/src/compat/openai.ts:10

Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak

Fq console leak

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/a7a5a213-d3bd-44fa-ad29-c93b3e7205e5/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/a7a5a213-d3bd-44fa-ad29-c93b3e7205e5/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.