Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

TrueCrimeDev/AHKv2_LLMs

https://github.com/TrueCrimeDev/AHKv2_LLMs · scanned 2026-06-16 00:42 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

41 raw signals (0 security + 41 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 36 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 5 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
57.9
/100
Security checks
58
0 findings
System graph
58
66.7% cov · 36 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 2 Medium 20 Low 11 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 36 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 4 Security 15 Cicd 3 Quality 12 Api 2
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 57.9/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 109 nodes across 3 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 41 findings — concentrated in security (15), quality (12), cicd (8). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 2 high, 20 medium. Recommended next step: open the security layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 33 of 36 actionable findings. 41 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high System graph security auth conf 1.00 FastAPI POST `parse_v2` without auth dependency — cloudahk/api.py:383
`@router.post` decorator with no `Depends(get_current_user)` or auth-shaped dependency in its signature. Mutating endpoints should require authentication unless explicitly public.
cloudahk/api.py:383 securityAuth fastapi unauth mutation
high System graph security auth conf 1.00 FastAPI POST `run_v2` without auth dependency — cloudahk/api.py:378
`@router.post` decorator with no `Depends(get_current_user)` or auth-shaped dependency in its signature. Mutating endpoints should require authentication unless explicitly public.
cloudahk/api.py:378 securityAuth fastapi unauth mutation
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — repos-feed.js:27
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — scripts/build.js:22
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected
A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.
CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
.github/workflows/static.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
.github/workflows/update-scripts.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in cloudahk/api.py:115
Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.
cloudahk/api.py:115 Cors wildcard
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in benchmarks.html:63
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
benchmarks.html:63 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in console.html:430
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
console.html:430 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in index.html:82
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
index.html:82 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in inheritance.html:640
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
inheritance.html:640 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in leaderboard.html:113
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
leaderboard.html:113 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in model.html:153
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
model.html:153 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in playground.html:415
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
playground.html:415 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in post.html:277
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
post.html:277 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in prompts.html:79
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
prompts.html:79 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in repos-feed.js:48
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
repos-feed.js:48 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in scripts/script-update.js:401
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
scripts/script-update.js:401 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in wiki.html:292
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
wiki.html:292 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 6 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 22 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 6 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
actions/checkout@v4 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
2 files, 6 locations
.github/workflows/static.yml:26, 29, 32, 38 (4 hits)
.github/workflows/update-scripts.yml:37, 42 (2 hits)
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Icon-only button without accessible name — scripts/script-update.js:597
A `<button>` whose only child is a single glyph or symbol needs `title=` or `aria-label=` so screen readers (and tooltips on hover) work. Why: P3 in CHECKLIST.md — icon-only buttons skipped a title. Rule id: fq.button.no-label
Fq button no label
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `run_v2` in cloudahk/api.py:379
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — scripts/build.js:61
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — scripts/script-update.js:51
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
low System graph api Wiring conf 1.00 Unused endpoint: POST /v2/parse
`cloudahk/api.py` declares `POST /v2/parse` but no frontend code we scanned calls it. This is fine if the endpoint serves external clients (mobile app, third-party, server-side webhooks). Otherwise it's dead code — consider removing or documenting who consumes it.
Unused endpoint
low System graph api Wiring conf 1.00 Unused endpoint: POST /v2/run
`cloudahk/api.py` declares `POST /v2/run` but no frontend code we scanned calls it. This is fine if the endpoint serves external clients (mobile app, third-party, server-side webhooks). Otherwise it's dead code — consider removing or documenting who consumes it.
Unused endpoint
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/ab9e0c35-d652-4469-8d3a-ddc7e0037a29/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/ab9e0c35-d652-4469-8d3a-ddc7e0037a29/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.