Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

ruvnet/RuView

https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView · scanned 2026-07-23 19:40 UTC (4 days, 21 hours ago) · 10 languages

594 raw signals (77 security + 517 graph) 26th percentile · Rust · large (100-500K LoC)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 21 hours ago · v6 · last Δ +7.8 (diff) · 523 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 61 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

100.0% cov · 490 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 3 High 131 Medium 270 Low 115 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 33 System graph 490 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 141 Security 250 Cicd 10 Software 19 Frontend 17 Network 4 Hardware 2 Dependencies 74 Api 6

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 2 findings

What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.

Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.

How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.

Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.

2 matching findings on this repo

low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places

View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →

Legacy markers 2 findings

What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.

Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.

How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.

Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.

2 matching findings on this repo

low Archive or legacy directory is mixed into the active repository root archive:1
low Old/deprecated-named symbol `ht_legacy` in archive/v1/src/hardware/csi_extracto…

View all legacy markers findings →

Commented-out code 1 finding

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

1 matching finding on this repo

info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/ruview-hap-bridge.py:117 scripts/ruview-hap-bridge.py:117

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 83 findings

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

12 matching findings on this repo

medium [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative ro… archive/v1/src/api/main.py:387
medium [AUC004] Admin route does not show super_admin separation: An administrative ro… archive/v1/src/app.py:293
low Possibly dead Python function: configure_third_party_loggers archive/v1/src/logger.py:225
low Possibly dead Python function: validate_app_configuration archive/v1/src/config.py:300
low Possibly dead Python function: reload_configuration archive/v1/src/config.py:305
low Possibly dead Python function: load_domain_config_from_file archive/v1/src/config/domains.py:434
low Possibly dead Python function: save_domain_config_to_file archive/v1/src/config/domains.py:473
low Possibly dead Python function: validate_rate_limit_config archive/v1/src/middleware/rate_limit.py:462
low Possibly dead Python function: validate_cors_config archive/v1/src/middleware/cors.py:333
medium insecure use string copy fn — firmware/esp32-csi-node/main/nvs_config.c:27 firmware/esp32-csi-node/main/nvs_config.c:27
medium KSV-0001: Can elevate its own privileges — logging/fluentd-config.yml
low KSV-0003: Default capabilities: some containers do not drop all — logging/fluen…

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/ad982fad-13fd-4eb8-940c-33c7ef4b6332/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/ad982fad-13fd-4eb8-940c-33c7ef4b6332/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.