Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

NVIDIA/NVFlare

https://github.com/NVIDIA/NVFlare · scanned 2026-06-16 04:35 UTC (1 month, 3 weeks ago)

15 raw signals (0 security + 15 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 14 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 1 repeated signal grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

44.4% cov · 14 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 3 Low 10 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 14 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 3 Security 1 Quality 10

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 74.2/100 with 44.4% coverage. It contains 76 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 15 findings — concentrated in quality (11), software (3), security (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 3 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 13 of 14 actionable findings. 15 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: AGENTS.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

AGENTS.md VerificationAgents md

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing ci. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.

auth

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 67 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Multiple root agent instruction files without precedence

The repo has multiple top-level AI-coder instruction files. Without precedence rules, different agents may follow different policies.

Governance

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 2 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: versioneer.py:render_pep440, versioneer.py:render This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.

2 occurrences

repo-level (2 hits)

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 7 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: versioneer.py:run_command, versioneer.py:run, versioneer.py:run, versioneer.py:run This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `render_pep440_old` in versioneer.py:927

Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.

old markerDead code

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: decorate

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

versioneer.py:375

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: finalize_options

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

versioneer.py:1776

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: initialize_options

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

versioneer.py:1773

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Stub function `initialize_options` (body is just `pass`/`return`) — versioneer.py:1773

Likely an AI scaffold that was never filled in. Remove or implement.

Empty handlerDead code

low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: versioneer.py (2124 lines)

Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/ada1367e-01e8-4f96-b35b-f79ad030bb90/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/ada1367e-01e8-4f96-b35b-f79ad030bb90/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.