Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

wangtao9090/VibeCAD

https://github.com/wangtao9090/VibeCAD · scanned 2026-06-16 00:54 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

20 raw signals (9 security + 11 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 17 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 20 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 11 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: layer: quality × excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 2 Medium 6 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 6 System graph 11 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 14 Frontend 1 Security 1 Cicd 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 95.6/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 846 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 11 findings — concentrated in quality (8), frontend (1), security (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 3 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 10 of 17 actionable findings. 37 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical Security checks quality Practices conf 0.82 3 occurrences Foundry mined mock as real or placeholder: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Graph query export: Mock, sample, placeholder, or self-attested behavior treated as real Query id: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for fake completeness and missing real data paths. Motif: mock_as_real_or_placeholder Training usage: hard_negative Graph gol…

3 occurrences

repo-level (3 hits)

high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.84 4 occurrences Foundry mined bad chains: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Comment chain pattern product: bad_chains Repo: wangtao9090/VibeCAD Thread: wangtao9090/VibeCAD#9 Outcome: not_resolved_or_not_observed Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_without_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_artifacts, l…

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

high Security checks quality Testing conf 0.78 4 occurrences Foundry mined test ci gap after feedback: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Graph query export: Feedback exposes missing tests or CI Query id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for feedback/fix chains without adequate guardrails. Motif: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Training usage: hard_negative Graph gold label: weak_supervision_needs_…

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.62 5 occurrences Foundry mined assumption checks: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks Repo: wangtao9090/VibeCAD Thread: wangtao9090/VibeCAD#6 Outcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_real_artifact…

5 occurrences

repo-level (5 hits)

medium Security checks quality maintenance conf 0.70 4 occurrences Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps Query id: blueprint_gap_alignment Query type: motif_query Intent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps. Motif: blueprint_gap_alignment Training usage: curriculum_gap Graph gold label: …

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.70 6 occurrences Foundry mined unresolved feedback: wangtao9090/VibeCAD

Graph query export: Human feedback without linked fix evidence Query id: unresolved_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Negative/unresolved examples that should not be hallucinated into fixes. Motif: unlinked_feedback_needs_evidence Training usage: negative_or_unresolved Graph gold label: need…

6 occurrences

repo-level (6 hits)

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — src/vibecad/runtime/micromamba.py:33

`urllib.request.urlopen(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.

runtime safetyRobustness

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: src/vibecad/runtime/paths.py:env_python_for, src/vibecad/runtime/paths.py:env_python This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/test_tools_features.py (1752 lines)

Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/ae767be6-5268-4a16-89f0-fdb2168ab330/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/ae767be6-5268-4a16-89f0-fdb2168ab330/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.