systemd/systemd

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

82 of your 109 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 23.63s · analysis 33.23s · 100.3 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

https://github.com/systemd/systemd · scanned 2026-06-05 17:13 UTC (4 days, 23 hours ago) · 10 languages

351 raw signals (103 security + 248 graph) 11/13 scanners ran 69th percentile · C · huge (>500K LoC) System graph score 72 (higher by 3)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 23 hours ago · v2 · 161 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 66 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

88.9% cov · 104 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	65.0	0.15	9.75
`security_score`	100.0	0.25	25.00
`testing_score`	48.0	0.20	9.60
`documentation_score`	71.0	0.15	10.65
`practices_score`	100.0	0.15	15.00
`code_quality`	45.0	0.10	4.50
Overall		1.00	74.5

security_score may be inflated — optional security scanners were skipped on this fast scan

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 35 Medium 53 Low 45 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 57 System graph 104 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 92 Cicd 8 Security 3 Software 25 Api 1 Network 31 Frontend 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 7 findings

What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.

Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.

How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.

Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.

7 matching findings on this repo

low Near-duplicate function bodies in 6 places
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 5 places
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 4 places
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 8 places
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 22 places repo-level

View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →

Commented-out code 11 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

11 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (8 lines) in .ycm_extra_conf.py:124
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in test/test-link-abi.py:77
info Commented-code block (9 lines) in test/sd-script.py:10
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in test/networkd-test.py:4
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in test/integration-tests/integration-test-wrapp…
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in test/test-network/systemd-networkd-tests.py:5…
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in tools/catalog-report.py:8
info Commented-code block (50 lines) in src/include/override/sys/generate-syscall.py…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in src/ukify/ukify.py:2387
info Commented-code block (8 lines) in src/ukify/test/test_ukify.py:4
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in hwdb.d/parse_hwdb.py:10

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 2 findings

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

2 matching findings on this repo

high [MINED106] Phantom test coverage: test_catchall_config_coldplug: Test function … test/networkd-test.py:1372
high [MINED106] Phantom test coverage: test_catchall_config: Test function `test_cat… test/networkd-test.py:1364

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/b700e0d3-537f-44f0-83a9-d34938a60700/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/b700e0d3-537f-44f0-83a9-d34938a60700/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.