Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

teemo18420085181-cyber/huitaipcb

https://github.com/teemo18420085181-cyber/huitaipcb · scanned 2026-06-16 00:31 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

27 raw signals (0 security + 27 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 27 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

88.9% cov · 27 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 1 Medium 16 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 27 Crowd 0 Layer: Api 1 Frontend 8 Data 1 Security 6 Cicd 1 Quality 10

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 66.1/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 449 nodes across 30 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 27 findings — concentrated in quality (10), frontend (8), security (6). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 1 high, 16 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 20 of 27 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high System graph security Secrets conf 1.00 Runtime dotenv file present in repo: .env.production

`.env.production` looks like a runtime dotenv file. No high-confidence secret value was matched, but runtime dotenv files often drift into live credentials. Move real values to a secret manager and keep only `.env.example` style templates in source control.

.env.production ConfigEnv fileRuntime env

medium System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` used in a React component — src/app/knowledge/[slug]/page.tsx:109

Open XSS surface unless the input is provably trusted. Replace with explicit JSX or sanitize via a vetted library. Why: OWASP basics. Already partially flagged by the security analyzer. Rule id: fq.dangerous-html

Fq dangerous html

medium System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` used in a React component — src/app/pcba-quote-file-checklist/page.tsx:204

Fq dangerous html

medium System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` used in a React component — src/components/JsonLd.tsx:133

Fq dangerous html

medium System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` used in a React component — src/components/SeoLandingPage.tsx:74

Fq dangerous html

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license, ci, tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data

A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.

Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'dangerous_innerhtml' in src/app/knowledge/[slug]/page.tsx:109

Found a known-risky pattern (dangerous_innerhtml). Review and replace if possible.

src/app/knowledge/[slug]/page.tsx:109 Dangerous innerhtml

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'dangerous_innerhtml' in src/app/pcba-quote-file-checklist/page.tsx:204

Found a known-risky pattern (dangerous_innerhtml). Review and replace if possible.

src/app/pcba-quote-file-checklist/page.tsx:204 Dangerous innerhtml

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'dangerous_innerhtml' in src/components/JsonLd.tsx:133

Found a known-risky pattern (dangerous_innerhtml). Review and replace if possible.

src/components/JsonLd.tsx:133 Dangerous innerhtml

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'dangerous_innerhtml' in src/components/SeoLandingPage.tsx:74

Found a known-risky pattern (dangerous_innerhtml). Review and replace if possible.

src/components/SeoLandingPage.tsx:74 Dangerous innerhtml

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.

auth

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

medium System graph data Coverage conf 1.00 ORM models found but no DB engine detected

The repo defines tables/models but no DB connection string was found. Likely lives in env vars or a config file the scanner didn't read.

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected

Found 44 placeholder/mock markers across 10 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.

Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

2 test file(s) for 80 source file(s) (ratio 0.03). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected

No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/lib/content/knowledge.ts (827 lines)

Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/b97c36d7-f8af-4043-bd82-6b91117a7da7/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/b97c36d7-f8af-4043-bd82-6b91117a7da7/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.