← Back to scan
File as GitHub Issue repo: cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server

Push this scan report to cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server

Click the green button below to open GitHub’s new-issue form, pre-filled with the report title, summary table, top findings, and an embedded score-card image. No authentication needed — you review on GitHub before submitting. Repobility is credited as the scanner.

Embedded score card image

This image will render at the top of the issue body. Hosted on Repobility, refreshes automatically after re-scans.

Repobility score card

Issue title

Duplicated implementation block across source files

Curate findings to include

Pick exactly which findings appear in the issue body. By default the top 5 are included. Uncheck noise, check what matters.

Top 5 (default)
Severity Rule Title File:line
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:83
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:76
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:58
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:51
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:108
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:98
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:91
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:99
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:89
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:82
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:131
MED AIC003 Duplicated implementation block across source files src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidi…:45
MED DKR014 Dockerfile copies broad context with incomplete .dockerignore Dockerfile:18
MED CORE_NO_CI No CI/CD configuration found —
LOW DKR008 .dockerignore misses sensitive defaults .dockerignore
Reset to top 5 15 findings available (after auto-suppression of test files + won't-fix)

Issue body (markdown)

## Code-quality scan: `cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server`

**Score: 83/100 (A-)**  ·  15 findings  ·  scanned 2026-05-16 08:40 UTC  ·  12,220 LOC

| Severity | Count |
|---|---|
| CRITICAL | 0 |
| HIGH | 0 |
| MEDIUM | 14 |
| LOW | 1 |

📊 [Full filterable report](https://repobility.com/scan/b9829876-033e-4608-8f34-b8994c52b0de/)  ·  ![scorecard](https://repobility.com/scan/b9829876-033e-4608-8f34-b8994c52b0de/report.png?v=1778920858-s2)

### Top findings

1. **MEDIUM** `AIC003` — Duplicated implementation block across source files
   `src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidian-replace-in-note.tool.ts:83`
2. **MEDIUM** `AIC003` — Duplicated implementation block across source files
   `src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidian-replace-in-note.tool.ts:76`
3. **MEDIUM** `AIC003` — Duplicated implementation block across source files
   `src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidian-patch-note.tool.ts:58`
4. **MEDIUM** `AIC003` — Duplicated implementation block across source files
   `src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidian-patch-note.tool.ts:51`
5. **MEDIUM** `AIC003` — Duplicated implementation block across source files
   `src/mcp-server/tools/definitions/obsidian-manage-tags.tool.ts:108`

---

_Filed automatically. Close this issue if not useful — we won't refile. Full report: https://repobility.com/scan/b9829876-033e-4608-8f34-b8994c52b0de/_
Premium account
This scan was submitted by a Enterprise-tier account. Premium accounts have full outreach control â Repobility doesn't pre-fill the 'file as GitHub issue' button for paid users. You can still file the issue manually using the markdown body above (Copy markdown), or contact us if you'd like batch-filing enabled for your account.
Megaproject â high spam risk
Could not determine 'cyanheads/obsidian-mcp-server' star count (GitHub API rate-limited or unreachable). When in doubt about repo size, prefer opening a focused PR or a discussion rather than an issue.
I read the warnings â override Cancel

The button opens GitHubâs new-issue page in a new tab. You will see the title + body pre-filled â review, edit if you want, then click GitHubâs "Submit new issue" button. Repobility never posts anything on your behalf.

For real security findings on big repos: use the project's SECURITY.md or private advisory flow instead of a public issue.