Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

jellyfin/jellyfin

https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin · scanned 2026-07-23 19:39 UTC (4 days, 20 hours ago)

5 raw signals (0 security + 5 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 20 hours ago · v3 · 5 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

70.0% cov · 5 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 5 Low 0 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 5 Crowd 0 Layer: Security 2 Quality 3

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Scan summary Repository scanned at 99.9/100 with 70.0% coverage. It contains 2935 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 5 findings — concentrated in quality (3), security (2). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 5 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 5 of 5 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected

A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.

CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data

A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.

Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph security security conf 0.65 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in MediaBrowser.Providers/Plugins/Tmdb/Configuration/config.html:107

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

MediaBrowser.Providers/Plugins/Tmdb/Configuration/config.html:107 Direct innerhtml assignment

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.

auth

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected

Found 101 placeholder/mock markers across 47 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.

Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/bac41b1b-2a62-47e2-a2b4-f3e9c669bb6e/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/bac41b1b-2a62-47e2-a2b4-f3e9c669bb6e/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.