Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

yahir0/Roola

https://github.com/yahir0/Roola · scanned 2026-06-16 01:04 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

35 raw signals (0 security + 35 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 21 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 14 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

77.8% cov · 21 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 14 Low 5 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 21 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 2 Network 3 Cicd 3 Quality 13

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 65.0/100 with 77.8% coverage. It contains 618 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 35 findings — concentrated in quality (16), cicd (14), network (3). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 20 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 15 of 21 actionable findings. 35 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/commands/opsx/apply.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

.claude/commands/opsx/apply.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/commands/opsx/archive.md

.claude/commands/opsx/archive.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected

A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.

CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 5 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

subosito/flutter-action@v2 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

3 files, 5 locations

.github/workflows/release-macos.yml:41, 129 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/release-windows.yml:40, 128 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/build-windows.yml:31

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 3 occurrences GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

3 files, 3 locations

.github/workflows/bump-version.yml

.github/workflows/release-macos.yml

.github/workflows/release-windows.yml

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 16 in use

Port 16 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.

branding/setup_demo_workspace.sh Ports

medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 23 in use

Port 23 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.

branding/setup_demo_workspace.sh Ports

medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 3 in use

Port 3 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.

branding/setup_demo_workspace.sh Ports

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 7 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 10 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 6 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

actions/checkout@v4 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

4 files, 6 locations

.github/workflows/release-macos.yml:31, 116 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/release-windows.yml:30, 120 (2 hits)

.github/workflows/build-windows.yml:21

.github/workflows/bump-version.yml:49

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 4 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: branding/generate_social_carousel.py:vgrad, branding/generate_stickers.py:vgrad This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.

4 occurrences

repo-level (4 hits)

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — tools/make_ico.js:15

Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak

Fq console leak

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/bd28732f-eace-4567-9192-2105f5fafcbe/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/bd28732f-eace-4567-9192-2105f5fafcbe/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.