Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

bohemian-miser/RecipeLanes

https://github.com/bohemian-miser/RecipeLanes · scanned 2026-06-17 01:42 UTC (1 month, 1 week ago)

181 raw signals (0 security + 181 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 1 week ago · v2 · last Δ -18.9 (diff) · 170 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 11 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

100.0% cov · 170 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 0 Medium 19 Low 115 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 170 Crowd 0 Layer: Api 1 Frontend 124 Security 5 Cicd 3 Quality 37

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Commented-out code 19 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

12 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (5 lines) in recipe-lanes/app/actions.ts:97
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in recipe-lanes/app/lanes/page.tsx:374
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in recipe-lanes/tests/shortlist-delta.test.ts:159
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in recipe-lanes/tests/verify-production-logic.te…
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in recipe-lanes/tests/icon-shortlist.test.ts:423
info Commented-code block (10 lines) in recipe-lanes/tests/icon-index.test.ts:58
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in recipe-lanes/tests/icon-pipeline.test.ts:334
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in recipe-lanes/tests/forge-gate-regression.test…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in recipe-lanes/scripts/prebuild.js:8
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in recipe-lanes/scripts/test-search.ts:40
info Commented-code block (8 lines) in recipe-lanes/components/recipe-lanes/react-fl…
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in recipe-lanes/components/recipe-lanes/nodes/mi…

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 1 finding

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

1 matching finding on this repo

info Commented-code block (7 lines) in recipe-lanes/lib/icon-queue-config.ts:33

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/befc8aec-d834-4d87-a037-b229c1d61b72/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/befc8aec-d834-4d87-a037-b229c1d61b72/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.