Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

tjhavranek/paper-workshop

https://github.com/tjhavranek/paper-workshop · scanned 2026-06-16 00:37 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

31 raw signals (0 security + 31 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 24 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 7 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
78.6
/100
Security checks
79
0 findings
System graph
79
55.6% cov · 24 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 4 Low 14 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 24 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 9 Frontend 2 Security 1 Quality 12
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 78.6/100 with 55.6% coverage. It contains 181 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 31 findings — concentrated in software (16), quality (12), frontend (2). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 4 medium. Recommended next step: open the software layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 18 of 24 actionable findings. 31 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected
A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.
CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio
0 test file(s) for 9 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.
Coverage
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 28 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: helpers/quote_gate.py:cmd_batch, helpers/absence_gate.py:cmd_batch This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 5 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: helpers/consistency.py:cmd_selftest, helpers/reproduces.py:cmd_selftest, helpers/integrity_diff.py:cmd_selftest, helpers/quote_gate.py:cmd_selftest This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-co…
duplicatesduplication
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: cmd_batch
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
helpers/quote_gate.py:128
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: cmd_batch
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
helpers/absence_gate.py:163
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 3 occurrences Possibly dead Python function: cmd_check
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
3 files, 3 locations
helpers/absence_gate.py:154
helpers/consistency.py:135
helpers/quote_gate.py:119
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: cmd_classes
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
helpers/reproduces.py:132
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: cmd_compare
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
helpers/reproduces.py:119
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: cmd_diff
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
helpers/integrity_diff.py:104
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: cmd_hash
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
helpers/provenance.py:193
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 6 occurrences Possibly dead Python function: cmd_selftest
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
6 files, 6 locations
helpers/absence_gate.py:183
helpers/consistency.py:155
helpers/integrity_diff.py:110
helpers/provenance.py:205
helpers/quote_gate.py:157
helpers/reproduces.py:137
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: cmd_verify
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
helpers/provenance.py:198
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph frontend Frontend quality conf 1.00 Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — examples/parse_selfaudit.js:77
Replace with the toast helper, an error boundary, or remove. `console.warn` / `console.error` are acceptable. Why: Hygiene — easy to leak debug output. Rule id: fq.console-leak
Fq console leak
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/c075c6fb-46d6-439c-a7f1-0e9f382dc190/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/c075c6fb-46d6-439c-a7f1-0e9f382dc190/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.