Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot

https://github.com/Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot · scanned 2026-06-16 00:05 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago)

26 raw signals (14 security + 12 graph)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 18 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 27 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 99.3/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 416 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 12 findings — concentrated in quality (7), software (3), frontend (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 1 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 15 of 18 actionable findings. 45 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical Security checks security auth conf 0.78 Foundry mined security auth guardrail gaps: Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot
Graph query export: Security/auth changes without enough guardrails Query id: security_auth_guardrail_gaps Query type: motif_query Intent: Assumption-check security/auth examples requiring stronger tests or CI. Motif: security_auth_without_guardrails Training usage: assumption_check Graph gold labe…
high Security checks quality Practices conf 0.84 Foundry mined bad chains: Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot
Comment chain pattern product: bad_chains Repo: Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot Thread: Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot#12 Outcome: not_resolved_or_not_observed Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_without_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has_re…
high Security checks quality Testing conf 0.78 8 occurrences Foundry mined test ci gap after feedback: Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot
Graph query export: Feedback exposes missing tests or CI Query id: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Hard negatives for feedback/fix chains without adequate guardrails. Motif: test_ci_gap_after_feedback Training usage: hard_negative Graph gold label: supported_by_high_confi…
8 occurrences
repo-level (8 hits)
medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.62 12 occurrences Foundry mined assumption checks: Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot
Comment chain pattern product: assumption_checks Repo: Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot Thread: Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot#9 Outcome: ambiguous_needs_more_evidence Thread label: thread_has_human_issue_and_fix_context Source graph label: source_artifact_without_verification_graph Reasons: source_graph_has…
12 occurrences
repo-level (12 hits)
medium Security checks quality maintenance conf 0.70 9 occurrences Foundry mined blueprint gap alignment: Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot
Graph query export: Human feedback aligned with blueprint or architecture gaps Query id: blueprint_gap_alignment Query type: motif_query Intent: Curriculum-gap examples connecting issue threads to helicopter-view gaps. Motif: blueprint_gap_alignment Training usage: curriculum_gap Graph gold label: …
9 occurrences
repo-level (9 hits)
medium Security checks quality Practices conf 0.70 2 occurrences Foundry mined unresolved feedback: Screddyice/qa-conflict-bot
Graph query export: Human feedback without linked fix evidence Query id: unresolved_feedback Query type: motif_query Intent: Negative/unresolved examples that should not be hallucinated into fixes. Motif: unlinked_feedback_needs_evidence Training usage: negative_or_unresolved Graph gold label: weak…
2 occurrences
repo-level (2 hits)
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected
No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.
CI/CD securityCoverage
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 9 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example
Drift between code and config docs. The first few: `ALERT_SLACK_BOT_TOKEN`, `ALERT_SLACK_CHANNEL`, `ALERT_SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL`, `ALLOW_ORGS`, `ALLOW_USERS`, `LINEAR_TOKENS`, `LLM_EXTRA_ARGS`, `QA_DEFAULT_ENABLED_ORGS` + 1 more. Add them (with a placeholder/comment) to .env.example so onboarding doesn…
config drift
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 18 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: src/pr_conflict_bot/qa/browse.py:capture, src/pr_conflict_bot/qa/browse.py:capture, src/pr_conflict_bot/qa/browse.py:capture This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidat…
duplicatesduplication
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: do_GET
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scripts/setup-github-app.py:69
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: health
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
src/pr_conflict_bot/server.py:97
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: log_message
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
scripts/setup-github-app.py:94
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Stub function `log_message` (body is just `pass`/`return`) — scripts/setup-github-app.py:94
Likely an AI scaffold that was never filled in. Remove or implement.
Empty handlerDead code
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/c15ecfc4-a820-418f-b0ed-b20da1579f56/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/c15ecfc4-a820-418f-b0ed-b20da1579f56/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.