← Back to scan
File as GitHub Issue repo: 521xueweihan/HelloGitHub

Push this scan report to 521xueweihan/HelloGitHub

Click the green button below to open GitHub’s new-issue form, pre-filled with the report title, summary table, top findings, and an embedded score-card image. No authentication needed — you review on GitHub before submitting. Repobility is credited as the scanner.

Embedded score card image

This image will render at the top of the issue body. Hosted on Repobility, refreshes automatically after re-scans.

Repobility score card

Issue title

Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell

Curate findings to include

Pick exactly which findings appear in the issue body. By default the top 5 are included. Uncheck noise, check what matters.

Top 5 (default)
Severity Rule Title File:line
HIGH SEC013 [SEC013] Path Traversal — User Input in File Path: User-controlled input used in file pat… script/make_content/make_content.py:45
MED AGT015 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell content/en/HelloGitHub92.md:81
MED AGT015 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell content/en/HelloGitHub50.md:48
MED AGT015 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell content/en/HelloGitHub29.md:32
MED AGT015 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell content/en/HelloGitHub102.md:188
MED AGT015 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell content/HelloGitHub92.md:88
MED AGT015 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell content/HelloGitHub50.md:55
MED AGT015 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell content/HelloGitHub29.md:39
MED AGT015 Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell content/HelloGitHub102.md:195
LOW CORE_NO_LICENSE No LICENSE file —
Reset to top 5 10 findings available (after auto-suppression of test files + won't-fix)

Issue body (markdown)

## Code-quality scan: `521xueweihan/HelloGitHub`

**Score: 85/100 (B)**  ·  10 findings  ·  scanned 2026-05-17 20:09 UTC  ·  313 LOC

| Severity | Count |
|---|---|
| CRITICAL | 0 |
| HIGH | 1 |
| MEDIUM | 8 |
| LOW | 1 |

📊 [Full filterable report](https://repobility.com/scan/c1a4d15c-54b9-41da-9273-c48aaa1fc173/)  ·  ![scorecard](https://repobility.com/scan/c1a4d15c-54b9-41da-9273-c48aaa1fc173/report.png?v=1779048546-s2)

### Top findings

1. **HIGH** `SEC013` — Path Traversal — User Input in File Path
   `script/make_content/make_content.py:45` · A01:2021 Broken Access Control (path traversal)
2. **MEDIUM** `AGT015` — Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell
   `content/en/HelloGitHub92.md:81`
3. **MEDIUM** `AGT015` — Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell
   `content/en/HelloGitHub50.md:48`
4. **MEDIUM** `AGT015` — Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell
   `content/en/HelloGitHub29.md:32`
5. **MEDIUM** `AGT015` — Remote install command pipes network code directly to a shell
   `content/en/HelloGitHub102.md:188`

---

**Security note**: this issue is public. If any flagged finding is a real, exploitable vulnerability, please redirect to your `SECURITY.md` policy or open a [private security advisory](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/security-advisories/guidance-on-reporting-and-writing-information-about-vulnerabilities/privately-reporting-a-security-vulnerability) instead. We're happy to close this and re-submit privately.

---

_Filed automatically. Close this issue if not useful — we won't refile. Full report: https://repobility.com/scan/c1a4d15c-54b9-41da-9273-c48aaa1fc173/_
Already filed
Repobility already filed issue #3277 on this repo on 2026-05-17. Filing again would be duplicate spam.
View existing issue
Premium account
This scan was submitted by a Enterprise-tier account. Premium accounts have full outreach control â Repobility doesn't pre-fill the 'file as GitHub issue' button for paid users. You can still file the issue manually using the markdown body above (Copy markdown), or contact us if you'd like batch-filing enabled for your account.
Megaproject â high spam risk
Could not determine '521xueweihan/HelloGitHub' star count (GitHub API rate-limited or unreachable). When in doubt about repo size, prefer opening a focused PR or a discussion rather than an issue.
Already filed
8/12 findings (67%) on this scan are already flagged as test-file, won't-fix, or suppressed. The scan is too noisy to file as a single issue. Curate down to specific actionable findings, or address the FP source first.
Cancel

The button opens GitHubâs new-issue page in a new tab. You will see the title + body pre-filled â review, edit if you want, then click GitHubâs "Submit new issue" button. Repobility never posts anything on your behalf.

For real security findings on big repos: use the project's SECURITY.md or private advisory flow instead of a public issue.