Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

senna-lang/Codeatrium

https://github.com/senna-lang/Codeatrium · scanned 2026-06-16 00:07 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

18 raw signals (0 security + 18 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 10 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 8 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 10 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 4 Low 4 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 10 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 1 Cicd 3 Quality 6

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 74.3/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 512 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 18 findings — concentrated in cicd (11), quality (6), frontend (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 11 medium. Recommended next step: open the cicd layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 8 of 10 actionable findings. 18 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: AGENTS.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

AGENTS.md VerificationAgents md

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 6 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

astral-sh/[email protected] can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

4 files, 6 locations

.github/workflows/publish.yml:17, 38, 47 (3 hits)

.github/workflows/ci.yml:20

.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml:24

.github/workflows/claude.yml:35

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 3 occurrences GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

3 files, 3 locations

.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml

.github/workflows/claude.yml

.github/workflows/publish.yml

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — src/codeatrium/cli/server_cmd.py:56

`subprocess.Popen(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.

runtime safetyRobustness

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 9 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 2 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned

actions/checkout@v6 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.

2 files, 2 locations

.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml:18

.github/workflows/claude.yml:29

CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

low System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Multiple root agent instruction files without precedence

The repo has multiple top-level AI-coder instruction files. Without precedence rules, different agents may follow different policies.

Governance

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/c1b41361-28d6-401e-ba3f-117eddfdb4ee/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/c1b41361-28d6-401e-ba3f-117eddfdb4ee/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.