Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

lucassosatidre/rhlove

https://github.com/lucassosatidre/rhlove · scanned 2026-06-16 02:54 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

8 raw signals (0 security + 8 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v2 · 8 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 8 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 0 Medium 2 Low 2 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 8 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 5 Frontend 1 Security 1 Cicd 1

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 70.4/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 21 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 8 findings — concentrated in quality (5), frontend (1), security (1). Risk profile is high: 1 critical, 0 high, 2 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 5 of 8 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical System graph security Secrets conf 1.00 Runtime dotenv file present in repo: .env

`.env` looks like a runtime dotenv file. It contains secret-looking assignments for SUPABASE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY, VITE_SUPABASE_PUBLISHABLE_KEY. Move real values to a secret manager and keep only `.env.example` style templates in source control.

.env ConfigEnv fileRuntime env

medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

low System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Low test-to-source ratio

1 tests / 6 src (ratio 0.17).

low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected

No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/c2302873-4029-4e1b-becb-112807c7658c/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/c2302873-4029-4e1b-becb-112807c7658c/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.