Yanyutin753/LambChat

Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

170 of your 359 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 6.0s · analysis 65.41s · 22.6 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

https://github.com/Yanyutin753/LambChat · scanned 2026-06-05 18:29 UTC (4 days, 19 hours ago) · 10 languages

988 raw signals (334 security + 654 graph) 11th percentile · Typescript · large (100-500K LoC)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 19 hours ago · v2 · 445 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 191 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

100.0% cov · 268 findings

Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5

Component	Sub-score	Weight	Contribution
`structure_score`	85.0	0.15	12.75
`security_score`	0.0	0.25	0.00
`testing_score`	100.0	0.20	20.00
`documentation_score`	99.4	0.15	14.91
`practices_score`	84.0	0.15	12.60
`code_quality`	24.2	0.10	2.42
Overall		1.00	62.7

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 70 Medium 38 Low 175 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 177 System graph 268 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 119 Security 52 Software 109 Cicd 11 Frontend 102 Hardware 2 Api 50

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 3 findings

What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.

Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.

How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.

Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.

3 matching findings on this repo

low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 4 places repo-level

View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →

Legacy markers 1 finding

What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.

Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.

How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.

Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.

1 matching finding on this repo

low Old/deprecated-named symbol `_get_fernet_legacy` in src/infra/mcp/encryption.py…

View all legacy markers findings →

Commented-out code 4 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

4 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (5 lines) in frontend/scripts/extract-i18n.ts:206
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in frontend/src/components/layout/AppContent/use…
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in frontend/src/hooks/useSessionConfig.ts:140
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in src/kernel/schemas/channel.py:19

View all commented-out code findings →

Config drift 11 findings

What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.

Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.

How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.

Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.

11 matching findings on this repo

high [SEC027] XML External Entity (XXE) — Node.js xml parsers: Node.js XML parsers c… frontend/src/components/documents/previews/Mermai…:167
low File has no detected symbols: frontend/tailwind.config.js
low File has no detected symbols: frontend/capacitor.config.ts
low File has no detected symbols: frontend/eslint.config.js
low File has no detected symbols: frontend/postcss.config.js
info `truncate` class without `title=` for hover reveal — frontend/src/components/pa…
info `truncate` class without `title=` for hover reveal — frontend/src/components/pa…
low Stray `console.log` in TS/JS — frontend/src/hooks/useSessionConfig.ts:278
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in frontend/src/hooks/useSessionConfig.ts:140
medium Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — src/kernel/config/utils…
low Unused endpoint: GET /api/upload/config

View all config drift findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/c2f396b1-928e-4ab7-b32a-7f17e0dd1d37/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/c2f396b1-928e-4ab7-b32a-7f17e0dd1d37/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.