Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

saorsa-labs/x0x

https://github.com/saorsa-labs/x0x · scanned 2026-06-16 00:02 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago)

95 raw signals (0 security + 95 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 50 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 45 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
75.4
/100
Security checks
75
0 findings
System graph
75
88.9% cov · 50 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 3 Medium 20 Low 19 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 50 Crowd 0 Layer: Network 6 Frontend 1 Security 6 Cicd 5 Quality 32
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 75.4/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 3071 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 95 findings — concentrated in cicd (50), quality (32), network (6). Risk profile is high: 0 critical, 8 high, 28 medium. Recommended next step: open the cicd layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 42 of 50 actionable findings. 95 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

high System graph security Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instruction/config may expose a secret: .claude/task_prompt.md
Agent-facing files are routinely pasted into LLM/tool contexts. Move literal tokens, keys, and passwords into a secret manager or document them as placeholders only.
.claude/task_prompt.md:24 SecretsClaude instruction
high System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 6 occurrences GitHub Action tracks a moving branch
dtolnay/rust-toolchain@master can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
lines 21, 36, 75, 128, 191, 245
.github/workflows/ci.yml:21, 36, 75, 128, 191, 245 (6 hits)
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
high System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'eval_used' in proofs/chrome-20260420/gui-parity-report.json:18
Found a known-risky pattern (eval_used). Review and replace if possible.
proofs/chrome-20260420/gui-parity-report.json:18 Eval used
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .claude/task_prompt.md
This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.
.claude/task_prompt.md VerificationClaude instruction
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 9 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
5 files, 9 locations
.github/workflows/ci.yml:104, 157, 160 (3 hits)
.github/workflows/release.yml:101, 268, 436 (3 hits)
.github/workflows/build.yml:83
.github/workflows/claude.yml:35
.github/workflows/security.yml:41
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
.github/workflows/claude.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
.github/workflows/release.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in src/gui/x0x-gui.html:841
Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.
src/gui/x0x-gui.html:841 Direct innerhtml assignment
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'local_storage_auth_token' in src/gui/x0x-gui.html:670
Found a known-risky pattern (local_storage_auth_token). Review and replace if possible.
src/gui/x0x-gui.html:670 Local storage auth token
medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'node_child_process' in package.json:11
Found a known-risky pattern (node_child_process). Review and replace if possible.
package.json:11 Node child process
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — .github/scripts/validate_release_metadata.py:81
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — scripts/adr-governance.py:35
`subprocess.check_output(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — scripts/install.py:133
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected
The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.
auth
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected
Found 20 placeholder/mock markers across 10 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.
Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 172 in use
Port 172 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/release.yml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 184 in use
Port 184 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/release.yml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 192 in use
Port 192 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/release.yml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 229 in use
Port 229 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/release.yml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 231 in use
Port 231 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/release.yml Ports
medium System graph network Security conf 1.00 Privileged port 50 in use
Port 50 is privileged (<1024). Make sure the service runs with the right caps or front it with a non-privileged port via a load balancer.
.github/workflows/release.yml Ports
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 53 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 33 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
actions/cache@v5 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
7 files, 33 locations
.github/workflows/ci.yml:42, 50, 58, 80, 88, 96, 116, 133, +4 more (12 hits)
.github/workflows/release.yml:106, 112, 118, 250, 271, 283, 337, 344, +3 more (11 hits)
.github/workflows/build.yml:88, 96, 104, 124 (4 hits)
.github/workflows/security.yml:24, 30 (2 hits)
.github/workflows/sign-skill.yml:17, 44 (2 hits)
.github/workflows/claude.yml:29
.github/workflows/integration.yml:119
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
low System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Multiple root agent instruction files without precedence
The repo has multiple top-level AI-coder instruction files. Without precedence rules, different agents may follow different policies.
Governance
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `_publish_result_legacy` in tests/runners/x0x_test_runner.py:411
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/direct.rs (1553 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/exec/service.rs (2260 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/gossip/pubsub.rs (1993 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/gossip/runtime.rs (1655 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/lib.rs (9988 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/network.rs (4022 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: src/presence.rs (1325 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/daemon_api_integration.rs (2227 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/e2e_full_audit.sh (1284 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/e2e_lan.sh (1296 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/e2e_named_groups.sh (1583 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/e2e_vps.sh (1087 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tests/launch_readiness.py (1969 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/c64a7b1d-54ba-4fac-8c5e-68676018f31a/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/c64a7b1d-54ba-4fac-8c5e-68676018f31a/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.