Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

tboman/x-auth-site

https://github.com/tboman/x-auth-site · scanned 2026-06-16 00:30 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

32 raw signals (0 security + 32 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 18 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 14 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
78.1
/100
Security checks
78
0 findings
System graph
78
88.9% cov · 18 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 6 Low 9 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 18 Crowd 0 Layer: Hardware 3 Frontend 1 Cicd 1 Quality 13
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 78.1/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 558 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 32 findings — concentrated in hardware (17), quality (13), frontend (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 6 medium. Recommended next step: open the hardware layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 15 of 18 actionable findings. 32 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — docs/examples/cryptofreight-spa/auth.js:48
Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing
AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license, tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected
A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.
CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
.github/workflows/deploy-services.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected
Found 61 placeholder/mock markers across 21 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.
Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap
Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph hardware Coverage conf 1.00 Containers defined but no K8s/orchestration manifest found
Repo has Dockerfiles/compose but no Kubernetes/Nomad manifests. If the target deployment is K8s, the manifests may live in a separate ops repo.
Deployment
low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 8 occurrences Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: gcr.io/distroless/static:nonroot
Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.
8 files, 8 locations
services/authentication-service/Dockerfile:8
services/authenticator-service/Dockerfile:8
services/broker-service/Dockerfile:8
services/grant-service/Dockerfile:8
services/persona-service/Dockerfile:8
services/pool-service/Dockerfile:8
services/risk-service/Dockerfile:8
services/transaction-service/Dockerfile:8
containersPinned dependencies
low System graph hardware Supply chain conf 1.00 8 occurrences Docker base image is tag-pinned but not digest-pinned: golang:1.22-alpine
Container tags can be retagged upstream. Pin production base images to a reviewed digest (`image@sha256:...`) when reproducibility and supply-chain integrity matter.
8 files, 8 locations
services/authentication-service/Dockerfile:2
services/authenticator-service/Dockerfile:2
services/broker-service/Dockerfile:2
services/grant-service/Dockerfile:2
services/persona-service/Dockerfile:2
services/pool-service/Dockerfile:2
services/risk-service/Dockerfile:2
services/transaction-service/Dockerfile:2
containersPinned dependencies
low System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Multiple root agent instruction files without precedence
The repo has multiple top-level AI-coder instruction files. Without precedence rules, different agents may follow different policies.
Governance
low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected
No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.
Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: services/authentication-service/internal/handlers_test.go (1618 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: services/authentication-service/internal/signup_console.go (1298 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/c704e99a-34ea-4c41-b424-c0168334f914/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/c704e99a-34ea-4c41-b424-c0168334f914/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.