Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

sean712/languageteacher

https://github.com/sean712/languageteacher · scanned 2026-06-16 00:05 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago)

36 raw signals (0 security + 36 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 34 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 2 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

77.8% cov · 34 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 15 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 34 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 5 Security 4 Cicd 1 Quality 24

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 78.5/100 with 77.8% coverage. It contains 337 nodes across 18 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 36 findings — concentrated in quality (26), frontend (5), security (4). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 17 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 18 of 34 actionable findings. 36 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — scripts/ingest-local.mjs:81

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — supabase/functions/_shared/innertube-transcript-provider.ts:112

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — supabase/functions/_shared/supadata-provider.ts:18

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — supabase/functions/_shared/youtube.ts:88

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, ci, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data

A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.

Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 3 occurrences Frontend route `/dashboard/:slug` has no Link/navigate to it — src/App.tsx

The route is registered but no `<Link to=…>` or `navigate(…)` in the codebase navigates here. Either it's reachable only via direct URL (intentional), it's dead, or the link broke during a refactor.

3 occurrences

repo-level (3 hits)

Orphan pageWiring

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in supabase/functions/connect-channel/index.ts:22

Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.

supabase/functions/connect-channel/index.ts:22 Cors wildcard

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in supabase/functions/evaluate-sentence/index.ts:18

Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.

supabase/functions/evaluate-sentence/index.ts:18 Cors wildcard

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in supabase/functions/lesson-chat/index.ts:17

Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.

supabase/functions/lesson-chat/index.ts:17 Cors wildcard

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'cors_wildcard' in supabase/functions/process-videos/index.ts:30

Found a known-risky pattern (cors_wildcard). Review and replace if possible.

supabase/functions/process-videos/index.ts:30 Cors wildcard

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Placeholder or mock-heavy implementation detected

Found 13 placeholder/mock markers across 8 source files. This often means the repo looks complete while core flows still use generated scaffolding or fake data.

Mock dataIncompleteGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Runtime service client appears to use placeholder configuration

A runtime source file appears to wire Supabase/Firebase/AI/payment-style clients to placeholder URLs, keys, or fallback values. In the Fable corpus this often means the UI/API shape is present while the backend service is not actually configured.

Runtime configService clientGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Very low test-to-source ratio

0 test file(s) for 56 source file(s) (ratio 0.00). Consider adding integration or unit tests for critical paths.

Coverage

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 8 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected

No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/c869d39b-23ae-4a03-bb5b-a658cbe357ec/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/c869d39b-23ae-4a03-bb5b-a658cbe357ec/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.