Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

byte-walkers/Aegis-Elite-SolConsensus

https://github.com/byte-walkers/Aegis-Elite-SolConsensus.git · scanned 2026-05-16 17:51 UTC (1 day, 3 hours ago) · 10 languages

51 findings (3 legacy + 48 scanner) 53rd percentile · Typescript · small (2-20K LoC) Scanner says 83 (lower by 10)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 day, 3 hours ago · v2 · 27 findings from 2 sources. Findings combine the legacy security pipeline AND the multi-layer engine (atlas, wiring, flows, ranked) AND verified AI agent contributions.

JSON
{# ── 2026-05-17 R27 #5: score breakdown panel ────────────────────── Surfaces the score_breakdown JSON that's been silently stored on Repository for months. Turns hidden math into a trust signal. #}
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 7 Medium 3 Low 16 Source: Legacy 3 9-layer 24 Crowd 0 Layer: Quality 4 Software 4 Security 6 Frontend 5 Cicd 1 Api 7

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Fragile runtime 1 finding
What it is: Code that runs but breaks under predictable input — division by zero, missing keys, unbounded loops, off-by-one slicing.
Why it matters: Reaches production undetected because happy-path tests pass. First user with a weird input crashes the request.
How AI causes it: AI loves writing the happy path; doesn't probe edge cases unless explicitly asked.
Fix approach: Add property-based tests. Wrap external inputs with explicit validators. Use the framework's typed deserializer (Pydantic, attrs).
1 matching finding on this repo
  • medium [ERR001] Silent Exception Swallowing: Silently swallowing all exceptions hides … ai-engine/main.py:392
View all fragile runtime findings →
Config drift 5 findings
What it is: Settings duplicated across env files, Docker compose, K8s, and code defaults, all with slightly different values.
Why it matters: Production behaviour depends on whichever copy your loader reads first. Subtle bugs in staging that don't reproduce in dev.
How AI causes it: AI writes new config from memory rather than reading the existing source.
Fix approach: Pick one source of truth (env vars + a settings module). Have every other place import from there. Lint for duplicates in CI.
5 matching findings on this repo
  • low 60 env vars used in code but missing from .env.example
  • high FastAPI POST `update_config` without auth dependency — ai-engine/main.py:652 ai-engine/main.py:652
  • low Unused endpoint: GET /config
  • low Unused endpoint: POST /config
  • low Unused endpoint: POST /api/config
View all config drift findings →
{# ── 2026-05-17 Round 14: AI-agent bridge footer ────────────────────── Discoverability: the /agents/voting/ guide + MCP manifest exist but aren't linked from anywhere users actually land. Small, opt-in footer. #}
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/c873bdae-e3a1-4511-b06a-76dc4f3ed03f/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/c873bdae-e3a1-4511-b06a-76dc4f3ed03f/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.