Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

xnhsky/bar-exam

https://github.com/xnhsky/bar-exam · scanned 2026-06-16 01:04 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

335 raw signals (0 security + 335 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 323 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 12 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

77.8% cov · 323 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 282 Low 30 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 323 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 8 Frontend 1 Security 262 Cicd 1 Quality 51

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 5 findings

What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.

Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.

How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.

Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.

5 matching findings on this repo

low Near-duplicate function bodies in 6 places
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places repo-level
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 3 places
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 4 places
low Near-duplicate function bodies in 5 places

View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →

Legacy markers 10 findings

What it is: TODO, FIXME, XXX, HACK comments. Often indicate a known-broken path the author meant to fix.

Why it matters: Each marker is an unfinished thought. Production code shouldn't ship with debt that's documented but not tracked.

How AI causes it: AI mirrors the style of the codebase, so existing TODOs propagate into new code.

Fix approach: Convert each into a ticket. Delete the comment when the ticket lands. Use a pre-commit hook to block new TODOs without an issue link.

10 matching findings on this repo

low File has no detected symbols: scripts/_eol_fix_legacy.py
medium Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.5-annex-… spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.5-annex-C.js:168
medium Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.4-annex-… spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.4-annex-C.js:168
medium Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.3-annex-… spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.3-annex-C.js:168
medium Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.1-annex-… spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.1-annex-C.js:54
medium Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.6-annex-… spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.6-annex-C.js:172
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.5-annex-C.js:29
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.4-annex-C.js:29
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.3-annex-C.js:29
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.6-annex-C.js:33

View all legacy markers findings →

Commented-out code 9 findings

What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.

Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.

How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.

Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.

9 matching findings on this repo

info Commented-code block (6 lines) in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.5-annex-C.js:29
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.4-annex-C.js:29
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.3-annex-C.js:29
info Commented-code block (6 lines) in spec/legacy/tx-v8.11.6-annex-C.js:33
info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/validate-tx.py:651
info Commented-code block (9 lines) in scripts/render.py:1745
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in scripts/build_fillin_template.py:317
info Commented-code block (10 lines) in scripts/upgrade_templates_views_slot.py:26
info Commented-code block (7 lines) in scripts/check_template_sync.py:134

View all commented-out code findings →

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/caffd7bd-b38b-477a-a1bd-226a410b7291/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/caffd7bd-b38b-477a-a1bd-226a410b7291/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.