Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
51 of your 73 findings came from Repobility's proprietary detections. ✓ Repobility tags below mark them.

Scan timing: clone 2.31s · analysis 3.67s · 8.7 MB · GitHub API rate-limit (preflight)

mjun0812/flash-attention-prebuild-wheels

https://github.com/mjun0812/flash-attention-prebuild-wheels · scanned 2026-06-05 23:28 UTC (4 days, 5 hours ago) · 10 languages

166 raw signals (70 security + 96 graph) 22nd percentile · Python · small (2-20K LoC) System graph score 82 (lower by 27)

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 4 days, 5 hours ago · v2 · 46 actionable findings from 2 signal sources. 72 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Score breakdown â 2026-05-18-v5
Component Sub-score Weight Contribution
structure_score 55.0 0.15 8.25
security_score 70.0 0.25 17.50
testing_score 0.0 0.20 0.00
documentation_score 76.0 0.15 11.40
practices_score 74.0 0.15 11.10
code_quality 63.4 0.10 6.34
Overall 1.00 54.6
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Bug-class explainers. Each card groups findings of the same shape — these are the patterns most likely to ship to prod and reappear in future scans unless you systematically fix the cause, not just the instance.

Duplicates & near-duplicates 1 finding
What it is: Same function copy-pasted into multiple modules with minor variations.
Why it matters: Each copy drifts independently — bug fixes apply to one, miss the others.
How AI causes it: AI completes the same pattern in each file rather than refactoring to a shared helper.
Fix approach: Extract the duplicated logic into the most general module both call sites already import. Add tests at the helper level.
1 matching finding on this repo
  • low Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places repo-level
View all duplicates & near-duplicates findings →
Commented-out code 4 findings
What it is: Lines of source that were intentionally disabled but never deleted.
Why it matters: Git already remembers history — commented code rots, becomes wrong, and adds noise to diffs.
How AI causes it: AI sometimes comments out broken code instead of fixing it. Reviewers approve out of inertia.
Fix approach: Delete. Trust `git log`. If you really need to remember, save it in a notes file under `docs/`.
4 matching findings on this repo
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/coverage_matrix.py:197
  • info Commented-code block (7 lines) in scripts/common.py:196
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/maintenance/update_readme_coverage.py…
  • info Commented-code block (5 lines) in scripts/tools/check_missing_packages.py:2
View all commented-out code findings →
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/cecd6390-391c-466a-b830-73895a94218c/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/cecd6390-391c-466a-b830-73895a94218c/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.