Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

sarturko-maker/lq-ai-fork

https://github.com/sarturko-maker/lq-ai-fork · scanned 2026-06-16 04:38 UTC (1 month, 3 weeks ago)

3 raw signals (0 security + 3 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 1 month, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 3 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

66.7% cov · 3 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 1 High 0 Medium 2 Low 0 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 3 Crowd 0 Layer: Security 1 Quality 2

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 69.4/100 with 66.7% coverage. It contains 41 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 3 findings — concentrated in quality (2), security (1). Risk profile is high: 1 critical, 0 high, 2 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 3 of 3 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

critical System graph security Secrets conf 1.00 Runtime dotenv file present in repo: .env.bak-f0-s4

`.env.bak-f0-s4` looks like a runtime dotenv file. It contains secret-looking assignments for POSTGRES_PASSWORD, MINIO_ROOT_PASSWORD, S3_ACCESS_KEY, S3_SECRET_KEY, LQ_AI_GATEWAY_KEY. Move real values to a secret manager and keep only `.env.example` style templates in source control.

.env.bak-f0-s4 ConfigEnv fileRuntime env

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: CLAUDE.md

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

CLAUDE.md VerificationClaude instruction

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing ci. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/d37950a8-5dc3-422b-a81d-9a17ba0170a9/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/d37950a8-5dc3-422b-a81d-9a17ba0170a9/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.