Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

tautology-labs/flowdiff

https://github.com/tautology-labs/flowdiff · scanned 2026-06-16 00:30 UTC (2 months, 2 weeks ago)

13 raw signals (0 security + 13 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 2 weeks ago · v1 · 13 actionable findings from 1 signal source. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

55.6% cov · 13 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 8 Low 3 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 13 Crowd 0 Layer: Frontend 1 Security 5 Cicd 1 Quality 6

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 81.0/100 with 55.6% coverage. It contains 295 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 13 findings — concentrated in quality (6), security (5), frontend (1). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 8 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 10 of 13 actionable findings. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — src/extract-python.test.ts:63

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent authority lacks a verifier contract: .mcp.json

This agent instruction grants code or shell authority but does not state the verification gate that decides promotion. The recurring safe pattern is: LLM proposes; deterministic tests/build/security checks verify; only verified code promotes.

.mcp.json VerificationMcp config

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'node_child_process' in bench/run.mjs:14

Found a known-risky pattern (node_child_process). Review and replace if possible.

bench/run.mjs:14 Node child process

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'node_child_process' in src/git.ts:1

Found a known-risky pattern (node_child_process). Review and replace if possible.

src/git.ts:1 Node child process

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'node_child_process' in src/tui.ts:1

Found a known-risky pattern (node_child_process). Review and replace if possible.

src/tui.ts:1 Node child process

medium System graph security Coverage conf 1.00 No auth library detected

The scanner did not find any standard auth library (JWT, OAuth, NextAuth, Auth0, etc.). The repo has auth/admin/session surface indicators, so auth may live in custom code, in a separate service, or be missing.

auth

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 No CI/CD pipelines detected

No GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or CircleCI configs found. Without CI you can't gate deploys on tests/lints.

CI/CD securityCoverage

low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: ci, lockfile. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality dependencies conf 1.00 Node manifest has dependencies but no lockfile: bench/tasks/billing-rounding/repos/app/package.json

`package.json` declares dependencies, but no same-directory npm/pnpm/yarn/bun lockfile was found. Generated projects without lockfiles are less reproducible and harder to secure-scan precisely.

bench/tasks/billing-rounding/repos/app/package.json LockfileReproducibilityGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/d909bcf6-cc7a-48e7-a839-97213e95ba2e/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/d909bcf6-cc7a-48e7-a839-97213e95ba2e/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.