Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.

TylerJForstrom/Plain

https://github.com/TylerJForstrom/Plain · scanned 2026-06-16 00:44 UTC (2 months, 1 week ago)

19 raw signals (0 security + 19 graph)

File as issue Image

UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 1 week ago · v1 · 18 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 1 repeated signal grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON

55.6% cov · 18 findings

Severity distribution — click a segment to filter

Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all

Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 5 Low 11 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 18 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 3 Frontend 1 Security 2 Cicd 1 Quality 11

Exclude dismissed / FP Exclude test files

Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.

Scan summary Repository scanned at 76.3/100 with 55.6% coverage. It contains 160 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 19 findings — concentrated in quality (12), software (3), security (2). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 5 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 16 of 18 actionable findings. 19 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 `fetch()` without try/.catch or AbortSignal — web/runner.js:9

Bare `fetch(...)` will throw an unhandled rejection on network failure. Wrap in try/catch, attach a `.catch(...)`, or pass an AbortSignal with a timeout.

runtime safetyRobustness

medium System graph quality Agent instructions conf 1.00 Agent instructions exist but release-hardening basics are missing

AI-coder instruction files were found, but the repo is missing license, tests. Treat this as a contract gap: the agent is guided, but the generated output is not yet guarded by the controls that make it repeatable.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

medium System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 CI is configured but no tests are detected

A CI pipeline exists, but the scan found no test files to gate. Opus labeled this generated-code pattern as config theater: release machinery exists, but it has little behavioral signal.

CI/CDConfig theaterRepo hardening

medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions

CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.

.github/workflows/ci.yml CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions

medium System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'direct_innerhtml_assignment' in web/app.js:265

Found a known-risky pattern (direct_innerhtml_assignment). Review and replace if possible.

web/app.js:265 Direct innerhtml assignment

low System graph quality Production readiness conf 1.00 Composite production-readiness gap

Multiple low-cost hardening controls are missing together: license, tests. Opus verification showed these co-occurring gaps are a better readiness signal than reading each flag in isolation.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files

Found 41 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.

CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph security security conf 1.00 Insecure pattern 'debug_true' in plain.py:3029

Found a known-risky pattern (debug_true). Review and replace if possible.

plain.py:3029 Debug true

low System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Low test-to-source ratio

1 tests / 8 src (ratio 0.12).

low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 2 occurrences Near-duplicate function bodies in 2 places

Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: plain.py:sort_key, plain.py:sort_key This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're separate.

2 occurrences

repo-level (2 hits)

duplicatesduplication

low System graph quality License conf 1.00 No license file detected

No LICENSE/COPYING/NOTICE file was found. Generated repositories often omit licensing, which blocks reuse and automated intake.

Repo hardeningGenerated repo pattern

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: run_to_end

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

plain.py:3037

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: sort_key

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

plain.py:2904

low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: step

No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.

plain.py:3033

low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence

The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.

Git historyGenerated repo pattern

low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: plain.py (3193 lines)

Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.

For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.

For AI agents + API integrations

Email me when this repo regresses

Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.

API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/dfe5d53e-3f65-4152-b06d-b2dcbcaa1a37/

To check status programmatically (no auth required):

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/dfe5d53e-3f65-4152-b06d-b2dcbcaa1a37/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.