← Back to scan
File as GitHub Issue repo: google/material-design-icons

Push this scan report to google/material-design-icons

Click the green button below to open GitHub’s new-issue form, pre-filled with the report title, summary table, top findings, and an embedded score-card image. No authentication needed — you review on GitHub before submitting. Repobility is credited as the scanner.

Embedded score card image

This image will render at the top of the issue body. Hosted on Repobility, refreshes automatically after re-scans.

Repobility score card

Issue title

High cognitive complexity: Function `main` has cognitive complexity 34 (SonarSource scale)

Curate findings to include

Pick exactly which findings appear in the issue body. By default the top 5 are included. Uncheck noise, check what matters.

Top 5 (default)
Severity Rule Title File:line
HIGH SEC103 [SEC103] LDAP injection — non-constant search filter: User input concatenated into an LDA… update/update_repo.py:178
HIGH SEC078 [SEC078] Python: requests without timeout: requests.get/post without a timeout will hang … update/update_repo.py:104
HIGH SEC029 [SEC029] Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input: Outbound HTT… update/update_repo.py:104
HIGH SEC128 [SEC128] Async function without await — fire-and-forget Promise (AI mistake): Async call … update/icons.py:36
HIGH COMP001 [COMP001] High cognitive complexity: Function `main` has cognitive complexity 34 (SonarSo… update/update_repo.py:218
MED SEC012 [SEC012] ZipSlip — Archive Path Traversal: Archive extraction without path validation all… update/update_repo.py:171
LOW COMP001 [COMP001] High cognitive complexity: Function `enumerate` has cognitive complexity 11 (So… update/icons.py:52
INFO MINED067 [MINED067] Python Requests No Timeout: requests.get/post/etc. without timeout= can hang f… update/update_repo.py:104
INFO MINED043 [MINED043] Http Not Https: Hardcoded http:// (not localhost) for endpoints that handle cr… update/update_repo.py:42
Reset to top 5 9 findings available (after auto-suppression of test files + won't-fix)

Issue body (markdown)

## Code-quality scan: `google/material-design-icons`

**Score: 77/100 (B)**  ·  9 findings  ·  scanned 2026-06-05 11:15 UTC  ·  0 LOC

| Severity | Count |
|---|---|
| CRITICAL | 0 |
| HIGH | 5 |
| MEDIUM | 1 |
| LOW | 1 |

📊 [Full filterable report](https://repobility.com/scan/e0bade49-2d04-41a0-b852-29f7e0ddaf56/)  ·  ![scorecard](https://repobility.com/scan/e0bade49-2d04-41a0-b852-29f7e0ddaf56/report.png?v=1780658155-s2)

### Top findings

1. **HIGH** `SEC103` — LDAP injection — non-constant search filter
   `update/update_repo.py:178` · A03:2021 Injection
2. **HIGH** `SEC078` — Python: requests without timeout
   `update/update_repo.py:104` · A05:2021 Security Misconfiguration
3. **HIGH** `SEC029` — Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) — outbound HTTP from user input
   `update/update_repo.py:104` · A10:2021 SSRF
4. **HIGH** `SEC128` — Async function without await — fire-and-forget Promise (AI mistake)
   `update/icons.py:36`
5. **HIGH** `COMP001` — High cognitive complexity: Function `main` has cognitive complexity 34 (SonarSource scale)
   `update/update_repo.py:218`

---

**Security note**: this issue is public. If any flagged finding is a real, exploitable vulnerability, please redirect to your `SECURITY.md` policy or open a [private security advisory](https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/security-advisories/guidance-on-reporting-and-writing-information-about-vulnerabilities/privately-reporting-a-security-vulnerability) instead. We're happy to close this and re-submit privately.

---

_Filed automatically. Close this issue if not useful — we won't refile. Full report: https://repobility.com/scan/e0bade49-2d04-41a0-b852-29f7e0ddaf56/_
Already filed
'google' is on the known-megaproject org list. These projects use auto-triage bots and established security disclosure channels. Unsolicited automated issues from Repobility would be perceived as AI-generated spam. For security findings, follow the project's SECURITY.md policy. For non-security findings, open a focused PR or community discussion instead.
Megaproject â high spam risk
Could not determine 'google/material-design-icons' star count (GitHub API rate-limited or unreachable). When in doubt about repo size, prefer opening a focused PR or a discussion rather than an issue.
Cancel

The button opens GitHubâs new-issue page in a new tab. You will see the title + body pre-filled â review, edit if you want, then click GitHubâs "Submit new issue" button. Repobility never posts anything on your behalf.

For real security findings on big repos: use the project's SECURITY.md or private advisory flow instead of a public issue.