Public scan — anyone with this URL can view this analysis. Sign up to track your own repos privately, run scheduled re-scans, and get AI fix prompts via your dashboard.
Sign up free Scan another repo

RyuuNeko1107/ja-furigana-dict

https://github.com/RyuuNeko1107/ja-furigana-dict · scanned 2026-06-15 23:58 UTC (2 months, 3 weeks ago)

31 raw signals (0 security + 31 graph)

File as issue Image
UNIFIED Repobility · multi-layer engine · AI coders

Complete repo analysis

Last scanned 2 months, 3 weeks ago · v1 · 26 actionable findings from 1 signal source. 5 repeated signals grouped for readability. Security checks, system graph analysis, and verified AI-agent feedback are merged into one review queue.

JSON
Combined
79.6
/100
Security checks
80
0 findings
System graph
80
88.9% cov · 26 findings
Critical
0
click to filter
Agents
10
0 votes
Crowd
0
reported
Severity distribution — click a segment to filter
Active filters: excluding tests × Reset all
Severity: Critical 0 High 0 Medium 7 Low 14 9-Layer: Software Security Quality Integrity Frontend Hardware Data Network Cicd Source: Security checks 0 System graph 26 Crowd 0 Layer: Software 6 Frontend 1 Cicd 3 Quality 16
Corpus Intelligence Cross-corpus context (cohort percentile, top patterns, fix plan) is shown only on repositories you own. Sign up and connect your repo to view it.
Scan summary Repository scanned at 79.6/100 with 88.9% coverage. It contains 405 nodes across 0 cross-layer flows, written primarily in mixed languages. Engine surfaced 31 findings — concentrated in quality (16), cicd (8), software (6). Risk profile is low: 0 critical, 0 high, 11 medium. Recommended next step: open the quality layer findings first — that's where the highest-impact wins live.

Showing 21 of 26 actionable findings. 31 raw detector signals were grouped into reader-sized issues. Click TP / FP to vote on a finding's accuracy — votes adjust the confidence weighting and improve detection across the platform.

medium System graph quality Placeholder conf 1.00 Critical user flow still appears backed by mock or placeholder data
A payment/auth/admin/order/billing-style flow contains mock, fake, TODO, dummy, or placeholder markers in runtime source. In the Fable corpus this is a high-leverage completeness smell: the app can look finished while the money, identity, or tenant flow is still scaffolded.
Mock dataCritical flowGenerated repo pattern
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
softprops/action-gh-release@v3 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
.github/workflows/release.yml:110 CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 5 occurrences GitHub Actions workflow grants broad write permissions
CI tokens with write permissions increase blast radius when an action, dependency, or PR workflow is compromised. Prefer job-level least-privilege permissions.
5 files, 5 locations
.github/workflows/auto-merge.yml
.github/workflows/build-pages.yml
.github/workflows/daily-release.yml
.github/workflows/regen-stats.yml
.github/workflows/release.yml
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — tools/check_default_regression.py:74
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — tools/check_test_append_only.py:45
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — tools/cleanup_old_deployments.py:22
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
medium System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Network/subprocess call without timeout or try/except — tools/diff_release.py:60
`subprocess.run(...)` here lacks both a `timeout=` arg and an enclosing try/except. This is exactly the class of bug that took down our git-clone earlier (HTTP/2 stream cancel surfaced as a fatal). Add a `timeout=` and wrap in try/except, or use a wrapper that retries.
runtime safetyRobustness
low System graph quality Debug conf 1.00 Debug logging residue appears in source files
Found 87 console/debugger/print-style debug statements in non-test source. This is a common fast-generation residue before production cleanup.
CleanupRepo hardeningGenerated repo pattern
low System graph cicd CI/CD security conf 1.00 2 occurrences GitHub Action is tag-pinned rather than SHA-pinned
actions/upload-pages-artifact@v5 can move without a code change in this repo. Pin third-party actions to a reviewed 40-character commit SHA.
lines 64, 78
.github/workflows/build-pages.yml:64, 78 (2 hits)
CI/CD securitySupply chainGithub actions
low System graph quality Tests conf 1.00 Low test-to-source ratio
2 tests / 11 src (ratio 0.18).
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Near-duplicate function bodies in 4 places
Functions with the same first-5-line body hash: tools/validate.py:add_for, tools/validate.py:add, tools/validate.py:add_for, tools/validate.py:add This is *the* AI-coder failure mode (4× more duplication in vibe-coded repos — see https://jw.hn/ai-code-hygiene). Consolidate or document why they're …
duplicatesduplication
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `dict_browser_sweep_v1` in tools/build_dict_browser.py:902
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph quality Integrity conf 1.00 Old/deprecated-named symbol `matched_old` in tools/diff_release.py:746
Names with suffixes like `_old`, `_v1`, `_deprecated` usually indicate replaced-but-not-removed code (typical AI-coder leftover). Confirm and delete, or rename if it's the active version.
old markerDead code
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: find_move_target
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
tools/diff_release.py:851
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: gh_api
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
tools/cleanup_old_deployments.py:18
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: load_kanji
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
tools/validate.py:724
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: load_unihan
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
tools/validate.py:716
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: validate_context
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
tools/validate.py:483
low System graph software Dead code conf 1.00 Possibly dead Python function: validate_single_overrides
No callers detected by AST scan in this repo. Could be exported for external callers or a framework handler.
tools/validate.py:277
low System graph quality Provenance conf 1.00 Shallow git history limits provenance confidence
The repository is a shallow clone. Origin/evolution analysis cannot distinguish fresh generation, imported legacy code, or long-lived human code with high confidence.
Git historyGenerated repo pattern
low System graph quality Complexity conf 1.00 Very large file: tools/build_dict_browser.py (2099 lines)
Files with >800 lines often hide complexity hotspots and discourage tests.
For AI agents: Voting guide (TP/FP) MCP manifest Stdio wrapper SARIF Integrate Findings queue Vote TP/FP on findings to calibrate the engine.
For AI agents + API integrations
Email me when this repo regresses
Free. We re-scan periodically; new criticals → your inbox. No signup required for the scan itself.
API access

This page is publicly accessible at: https://repobility.com/scan/e3ac75d8-516c-4123-98e3-d7295b688ae8/

To check status programmatically (no auth required): 

curl -s https://repobility.com/api/v1/public/scan/e3ac75d8-516c-4123-98e3-d7295b688ae8/

Important — please don't re-submit the same URL repeatedly. The submission endpoint is idempotent: re-submitting the same git URL returns this same scan_token, not a new one. To re-scan this repo, sign up free and use the dashboard.